Juan Jose Salazar et al v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 328

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: This action came before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. After full consideration of all admissible evidence, the Court finds that there is no triable issue of material fact in this case with regard to Plaintiffs' claims againstDefendants that enforcement of California Vehicle Code § 14602.6 violates their state and federal constitutional rights. It is hereby adjudged and decreed that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants and Plaintiffs take nothing. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rrey)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. JUAN JOSE SALAZAR, et al., Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CV 07-01854 SJO (VBKx) JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6

This action came before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. After full consideration of all admissible evidence, the Court finds that there is no triable issue of material fact in this case with regard to Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants that enforcement of California Vehicle Code § 14602.6 violates their state and federal constitutional rights. It is hereby adjudged and decreed that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants and Plaintiffs take nothing. IT IS SO ADJUDGED. Dated this 18th day of September, 2008. /S/ S. James Otero S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE