Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. Time Warner Cable Inc

Filing 1036

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) The Cablevision Defendants Counterclaims are hereby dismissed withoutprejudice; (2) FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the CablevisionDefendants and against Plaintiff RAKTL; and (3) The Cablevision Defendants are the prevailing parties and shall be entitled to be awarded their costs of suit.SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

DAVID A. SEGAL, SBN 166635 [e-mail] JOSH A. KREVITT, SBN 208552 [e-mail] GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 3161 Michelson Drive Irvine, California 92612-4412 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND RELATED CABLEVISION ENTITIES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: CASE NO. 2:07-ML-01816-RGK-FFM

] FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST KATZ INTERACTIVE CALL PROCESSING PATENT LITIGATION RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P. AND IN FAVOR OF CABLEVISION SYSTEMS This document is related to: CORPORATION AND RELATED Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, DEFENDANTS L.P. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc., et al. 2:07-CV-02134-RGK-FFM The Honorable R. Gary Klausner

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

WHEREAS the Court issued the following Orders: (i) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Joint Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under Section 112, dated June 19, 2008 (MDL D.I. 2330; D.I. 474) (ii) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Joint Summary Judgment of Invalidity Under Sections 102 and 103, dated August 4, 2008 (MDL D.I. 2547; D.I. 524); (iii) Ruling on the Parties' Individual Summary Judgment Motions, dated August 13, 2009 (MDL D.I. 6718; D.I. 1029); and (iv) Granting Cablevision's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Answer to Assert Collateral Estoppel and For Leave to File Additional Motion for Summary Judgment, dated August 14, 2009 (MDL D.I. 6721; D.I. 1030); WHEREAS, for the reasons set forth in the aforementioned Orders, all of the claims asserted against Defendants-Counterclaimants Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings, Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven, Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County, Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield, Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth, Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey, Inc., Cablevision of Oakland, LLC, and Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo, LLC (collectively, the "Cablevision Defendants") have now been adjudicated; WHEREAS the Court requested that Cablevision submit a final judgment and the Cablevision Defendants request that all of their counterclaims be dismissed without prejudice; and WHEREAS, in light of the foregoing, entry of judgment in favor of the Cablevision Defendants is appropriate with respect to all of Plaintiff Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.'s ("RAKTL") claims for relief.

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) prejudice; (2) (3) FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the Cablevision The Cablevision Defendants are the prevailing parties and shall be entitled Defendants and against Plaintiff RAKTL; and to be awarded their costs of suit. SO ORDERED. Dated:_9/2/09 Respectfully submitted, DAVID A. SEGAL GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP By: /s/David A. Segal David A. Segal Counsel for the Cablevision Defendants The Cablevision Defendants' Counterclaims are hereby dismissed without

HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2