Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al

Filing 121

Ticketmaster LLC v. RMG Technologies Inc et al

Doc. 121

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW LO S A N G E L E S

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TICKETMASTER L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. RMG TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. RMG TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, vs. TICKETMASTER L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, IAC/INTERACTIVE CORP., a Delaware corporation, and ROES 1 through 10, inclusive, Counterclaim-Defendants. Date: Time: Place: June 2, 2008 10:00 a.m. The Courtroom of the Hon. Audrey B. Collins Case No. CV 07-2534-ABC (JCx) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE RMG TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S ANSWER, ENTER DEFAULT, AND DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS

Complaint filed: April 17, 2007

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW LO S A N G E L E S

The motion of plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Ticketmaster L.L.C. and counterclaim-defendant IAC/InterActiveCorp to strike defendant and counterclaimant the Answer of RMG Technologies, Inc. ("RMG"), enter default against RMG, and dismiss RMG's Second Amended Counterclaims came on regularly for hearing. RMG did not oppose or otherwise appear in response to Ticketmaster's motion. After considering the papers and evidence regarding this motion, and the pleadings and papers on file with the Court, and GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN THEREFOR: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. 2. 3. prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 29, 2008 SUBMITTED BY: MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP ROBERT H. PLATT (Bar No. 108533) MARK S. LEE (Bar No. 094103) CHAD S. HUMMEL (Bar No. 139055) __s/ Mark S. Lee________ _____ Mark S. Lee Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Ticketmaster L.L.C. and Counter-Defendant IAC/INTERACTIVECORP ____________________________ Hon. Audrey B. Collins that RMG's Answer to Ticketmaster L.L.C.'s First Amended that default judgment be entered against RMG; and that RMG's Second Amended Counterclaims are dismissed with Complaint is stricken;

41271869.2

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE