Vincent Hubbard v. Kenneth Marshall

Filing 67

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Gary A. Feess: IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Second Amended Complaint is stricken; (2) defendants Vardaro and Wong are dismissed with prejudice; and (3) defendant Marshall is required to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. (jm)

Vincent Hubbard v. Kenneth Marshall

Doc. 67

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: July 15, 2010 GARY A. FEESS United States District Judge v. KENNETH MARSHALL, Defendant. VINCENT HUBBARD, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 07-2872 GAF (FFM) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Second Amended Complaint is stricken; (2) defendants Vardaro and Wong are dismissed with prejudice; and (3) defendant Marshall is required to file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.

Dockets.Justia.com