Alejandro Rodriguez v. James Hayes et al
Filing
188
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block re Stipulation for Protective Order, 186 . This matter comes before this Court on the parties' joint stipulation for the entry of a protective order governing confidential information. (See Protective Order for details). (wr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
TONY WEST
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Division
DAVID J. KLINE
Director, Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
VICTOR M. LAWRENCE
Principal Assistant Director
THEODORE W. ATKINSON
Senior Litigation Counsel
United States Department of Justice
Civil Division
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
Tel.: (202) 532-4135
e-mail: theodore.atkinson@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Respondents
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
WESTERN DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
)
)
)
Petitioners,
)
)
vs.
)
)
TIMOTHY S. ROBBINS, in his
)
capacity as U.S. Immigration and
)
Customs Enforcement, Los Angeles
District Field Office Director;
)
JANET NAPOLITANO, in her
)
capacity as Secretary of Homeland
)
Security; and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., )
in his capacity as Attorney General of )
the United States,
)
)
Respondents.
)
)
Case No. CV 07-3239-TJH (RNBx)
DISCOVERY MATTER
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Hon. Robert N. Block
1
2
3
This matter comes before this Court on the parties’ joint stipulation for the
entry of a protective order governing confidential information. Good cause exists
4
for the entry of a protective order because discovery in this action has and will
5
result in the disclosure by the parties of personal and confidential non-privileged
6
7
information, including electronic database information, possibly information from
8
alien files (or “A-Files”), and other information concerning members of the class
9
certified in this action and other individuals. The parties having agreed to the
10
11
following terms governing the treatment of confidential information, and the
12
Court having found that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately-tailored
13
confidentiality order governing the pre-trial phase of this action, it is
14
15
16
17
HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11), this Stipulated Protective Order
authorizes Respondents to produce private identifying information and other
18
19
information discoverable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) that Petitioner seeks
20
without requiring officials of the United States to pre-screen each document for
21
objections under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and presenting those objections
22
23
24
25
to this Court for a decision regarding disclosure.
2.
The terms of this Stipulated Protective Order will govern the parties’
production of information in response to discovery requests, to the extent that such
26
27
28
production contains “Confidential Information” as defined in paragraph 3 and
designated in paragraph 4. The terms of this Order shall also govern the
1
1
2
3
safeguarding of such information by all individuals referenced in paragraph 6.
3.
As used in this Stipulated Protective Order, “Confidential
4
Information” is defined as any information not publicly available that is disclosed
5
by the parties in this action and which at or before the time of disclosure has been
6
7
designated as “Confidential” by the parties in accordance with paragraph 4. The
8
disclosure of all information that the parties previously agreed to keep confidential
9
shall now be governed by this Stipulated Protective Order. “Confidential
10
11
Information” is the following: (a) the names, alien numbers, locations of, or any
12
other identifying information which would allow the identification of the
13
particular individual(s) to whom the information relates, (b) individual medical
14
15
information, (c) certain individual financial and tax information, (d) non-public
16
divorce decrees, (e) any information that is protected or restricted from disclosure
17
by statute or regulation, but which the Court has ordered to be produced, and (f)
18
19
any other category of information hereinafter given confidential status by the
20
Court. If a designating party determines that information not described in this
21
paragraph should be designated as “Confidential Information,” the parties shall
22
23
negotiate the appropriateness of that designation in good faith and endeavor to
24
resolve any dispute prior to the production of that information. Information that is
25
not “Confidential Information” includes, but is not limited to, aggregate
26
27
28
information concerning class members that does not permit the identification of
the particular individuals to whom the information relates.
2
1
2
3
4.
or more of the following ways:
a.
4
5
6
7
“Confidential Information” set forth in a response to an
interrogatory may be so designated by including the word “Confidential” in the
response.
b.
8
9
“Confidential Information” may be designated by the parties in one
“Confidential Information” contained in a document or part
thereof may be so designated by marking the production of any “Confidential
10
11
Information” with the words “CONFIDENTIAL” or “THIS DOCUMENT IS
12
SUBJECT TO A COURT ORDER IN RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. v. ROBBINS, ET
13
AL., No. 07-cv-3239 (C.D. Cal.). THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS CONTENTS
14
15
16
SHALL NOT BE USED, SHOWN OR DISTRIBUTED EXCEPT AS
PROVIDED IN THE PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED IN THIS ACTION.”
17
c.
“Confidential Information” contained in any statement made
18
19
20
during an oral deposition may be so designated through a statement made on the
record.
21
d.
Information that is otherwise properly designated as
22
23
“Confidential Information” shall not be so designated or considered where the
24
detainee to whom the information refers has affirmatively consented to its
25
disclosure.
26
27
28
5.
If a Party disagrees with a designation of “Confidential Information,”
it shall provide the designating party written notice of its challenge. If the parties
3
1
2
3
cannot resolve this dispute, a non-designating party may object to and challenge
the designation of any information as “Confidential Information” in a manner that
4
comports with Local Rules 37-1 and 37-2. The designating party bears the burden
5
of showing that information is confidential. Failure to challenge a designation
6
7
8
9
immediately does not waive a party’s ability to bring a later challenge.
6.
Information designated as “Confidential Information,” including the
portion of any document containing “Confidential” information, may be disclosed
10
11
by a non-designating party only to the following persons:
a.
12
13
counsel for the parties to this action and any support staff and
other employees of such counsel assisting in this action with an appropriate need
14
15
to know;
b.
16
17
any experts retained for this action by counsel to a party or
support staff or employees of such an expert, subject to paragraph 9;
18
c.
19
20
any other person mutually authorized by the parties’ counsel to
examine such information, subject to paragraph 9;
21
d.
the Court and its personnel, including court reporters.
22
23
7.
All persons listed in paragraph 6(a) to whom “Confidential”
24
information is disclosed are hereby prohibited from disclosing to, or otherwise
25
discussing with, any person other than those listed in paragraph 6(a)-(d), any
26
27
28
information designated as “Confidential Information,” except as provided in this
Stipulated Protective Order.
4
1
2
3
8.
All persons listed in paragraphs 6(b) and 6(c) to whom “Confidential
Information” is disclosed shall first be required to read the terms of this Stipulated
4
Protective Order and sign a copy of the Acknowledgment of Protective Order
5
form, attached hereto as Exhibit A, agreeing to be bound thereby. This
6
7
8
9
requirement does not apply to the disclosure of Confidential Information to the
Court and its personnel, including court reporters.
9.
In the event a party wishes to use any “Confidential Information”
10
11
produced under this Stipulated Protective Order to move the Court to resolve a
12
matter arising from litigating this action only, or to oppose such motion, such
13
pleadings shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.
14
15
10.
If a party expects to use “Confidential Information” at any hearing,
16
trial, or appellate proceeding in this action, the non-designating party shall provide
17
the designating party with sufficient opportunity to request that the Court exclude
18
19
20
21
the information from the public record.
11.
Except as provided in this paragraph or elsewhere in this Stipulated
Protective Order, all discovery produced or exchanged that contains designated
22
23
“Confidential Information” shall be used solely for the purposes of litigating this
24
action and for no other purpose whatsoever and shall not be disclosed,
25
disseminated, or transmitted to any person, entity, or organization except in
26
27
accordance with the terms hereof.
28
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a.
Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall preclude the
disclosure of any “Confidential Information” with respect to a detainee who
affirmatively consents to the disclosure of that information.
b.
The limitations and restrictions on the disclosure of
“Confidential Information” under this Stipulated Protective Order shall not apply
8
to “Confidential Information” (1) that the Court has ordered Respondents to
9
produce, and (2) that comes from the requested A-File materials of an individual
10
11
who presently is or will be a class member. This exception does not apply to post-
12
order custody review worksheets that may be contained in an A-File. Because the
13
exception in this paragraph permits a class member to disclose the “Confidential
14
15
Information” described in this paragraph without restriction or limitation,
16
including through class counsel with a class member’s authorization or consent,
17
the exception described in this paragraph shall remain in effect only so long as
18
19
20
21
counsel for Petitioners remain as counsel for the certified class in this action.
c.
The limitations and restrictions on “Confidential Information”
in this Stipulated Protective Order shall not apply with respect to information
22
23
24
25
obtained through a third-party source other than through discovery production.
d.
This Stipulated Protective Order shall not preclude any party
from disclosing publicly-available information.
26
27
28
6
1
2
3
12.
The parties shall maintain “Confidential Information” as follows:
a.
If the parties mutually agree that some “Confidential
4
Information” relates to individuals who were never class members, Counsel for
5
Petitioner shall destroy information related to those people within ten (10) days of
6
7
their mutual decision, and Counsel for Petitioner shall certify in writing to
8
Counsel for Respondents that such information has been destroyed. If the parties
9
do not agree, and if the Court determines that “Confidential Information” relates
10
11
to individuals who were never class members, then within ten (10) days of the
12
Court’s having made that determination, counsel for Petitioners shall destroy the
13
“Confidential Information” related to non-class members, and certify in writing to
14
15
16
17
Counsel for Respondents that such information has been destroyed.
b.
Petitioners and anyone to whom “Confidential Information”
has been disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 6(a) through 6(c) shall maintain
18
19
all remaining “Confidential Information” pursuant to the terms of this Stipulated
20
Protective Order, subject to further order by this Court (this provision does not
21
apply to Confidential Information disclosed to and maintained by the Court and its
22
23
personnel, including court reporters). Within ten (10) days after the final
24
disposition of this action, including any and all appeals, all discovery and copies
25
thereof in the possession of Petitioners and anyone to whom “Confidential
26
27
Information” has been disclosed in accordance with paragraphs 6(a) – (c) shall be
28
7
1
2
3
returned to the producing parties or destroyed, at the option of the disclosing
party, except as this Court may otherwise order.
c.
4
5
6
7
8
9
Notwithstanding subparagraph 12(b), counsel of record may
maintain a complete set of discovery for their records, provided that such counsel
maintain the confidential nature of the discovery.
13.
Counsel for either party shall notify the other of any inadvertent
disclosure of information concerning any individual who is not a class member
10
11
12
13
and shall destroy information related to such individuals consistent with the terms
of paragraph 12(a).
14.
Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall be construed as a
14
15
waiver of any defense, right or claim by either party, nor shall this Stipulated
16
Protective Order affect the right of Respondents to seek additional protection
17
against the disclosure of any documents or materials, or of Petitioner to seek
18
19
20
21
additional disclosures.
15.
Any party may apply to this Court at any time, upon proper notice,
for a modification of this Stipulated Protective Order with respect to the handling
22
23
24
25
or designation of any document or for any other purpose.
16.
Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall be taken to authorize
the disclosure of information otherwise barred from disclosure pursuant to Local
26
27
Rule 79-5.4.
28
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
17.
This Stipulated Protective Order shall be binding upon any present or
future party to the Rodriguez, et al. v. Robbins, et al., No. 07-cv-3239-TJH
(RNBx) (C.D. Cal.), litigation.
18.
This Stipulated Protective Order shall be effective and enforceable
upon entry by the Court, except that the Parties may agree to abide by its terms
prior to entry of any order.
19.
The terms of this Stipulated Protective Order shall survive the
10
11
12
termination of this action proceeding after its final disposition for purposes of
enforcing this Stipulated Protective Order.
13
14
15
16
July 6
Dated: _________, 2011
________________________________________
ROBERT N. BLOCK
United States Magistrate Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
1
2
3
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
4
I, _________________________, am associated with the litigation in
5
Rodriguez, et al. v. Robbins, et al., No. 07-cv-3239-TJH (RNBx) (C.D. Cal.) in
6
7
the capacity of __________________________________. I acknowledge reading
8
and understanding the Stipulated Protective Order Governing Confidential
9
Information issued in Rodriguez on ____________, and agree to be bound by all
10
11
12
13
provisions thereof.
Executed this ___ day of ______ at ____________________.
SIGNATURE: _____________________________________
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
1
PRESENTED BY:
2
TONY WEST
Assistant Attorney General
DAVID J. KLINE
Director,
Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
VICTOR M. LAWRENCE
Principal Assistant Director
By: /s/ Theodore W. Atkinson
THEODORE W. ATKINSON
Senior Litigation Counsel
P.O. Box 868, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
Tel: (202) 532-4135
e-mail: theodore.atkinson@usdoj.gov
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Respondents
11
12
By: /s/ Ahilan Arulanantham
AHILAN T. ARULANANTHAM
ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
13
Attorneys for Petitioners
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?