Maria Barrios v. Diamond Contract Services Inc

Filing 138

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. ("Defendant") shall pay Plaintiff Maria Barrios ("Plaintiff") reasonable attorneys' fees in the amount of $231,235 and litigation costs in the amount of $28,047.69; Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the jury verdict amount of $8,500 awarded to her for lost wages and compensatory damages 72 ; Defendant shall pay Plaintiff 9;s appellate attorneys' fees in the amount of $50,618 awarded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, [Docket No. 43]; 5. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the Ninth Circuit Clerks taxe d costs inthe amount of $512.41 for Plaintiff's appeal [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Docket No. 38]; 6. Accordingly, Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Maria Barrios and against Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. in the total amount of $318,913.09; This Final Judgment shall take effect immediately upon its entry; There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 54 and 58(b), the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED thatthis Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment and the Courts prior Order requiring Defendant to pay the total amount due by November 26, 2012. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

5

ACKERMANN & TILAJEF, P.C.
JS-6
Craig J. Ackerman (State Bar No. 229832)
Tatiana Hernandez (State Bar No. 255322)
1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 610
Los Angeles, California 90035
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
Email:[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff Maria Barrios

1
2
3
4

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

Maria Barrios,
Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Diamond Contract Services, Inc.
Defendant.

) Case No. 2:07-cv-03500-CBM-FMO
)
) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
)
) Assigned to: Hon. Consuelo Marshall
)
) Courtroom: No. 2
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)_
)
)
)
)
)
)

24
25
26
27
28

FINAL JUDGMENT
-1-

1
2

FINAL JUDGMENT
1.

For the reasons set forth in the Order granting Plaintiff’s Second

3
4

Amended Motion for Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Costs and granting

5

Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion Pursuant to Local Rule 7-19 Requesting that a

6
7

Deadline be Established for Defendant to Pay Plaintiff’s Appellate Attorney’s Fees

8

Previously Awarded by the Ninth Circuit [Docket No.134], which are adopted and

9
10
11
12

incorporated herein by reference, and Judgment having entered on the Jury’s
General Verdict in favor of Plaintiff Maria Barrios on November 12, 2008 [Docket
No. 72], IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT:

13
14
15

2.

Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) shall pay

Plaintiff Maria Barrios (“Plaintiff”) reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of

16
17
18
19

$231,235 and litigation costs in the amount of $28,047.69;
3.

Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the jury verdict amount of $8,500

awarded to her for lost wages and compensatory damages [Docket No.72];

20
21
22

4.

Defendant shall pay Plaintiff’s appellate attorneys’ fees in the amount

of $50,618 awarded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [U.S. Court

23
24

of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, [Docket No. 43];

25
26
27
28

FINAL JUDGMENT
-2-

1
2

5.

Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the Ninth Circuit Clerk’s taxed costs in

the amount of $512.41 for Plaintiff’s appeal [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth

3
4
5

Circuit, Docket No. 38];
6.

Accordingly, Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff

6
7

Maria Barrios and against Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. in the total

8

amount of $318,913.09;

9
10
11
12

7.

This Final Judgment shall take effect immediately upon its entry;

8.

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, Rules 54 and 58(b), the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final

13
14
15

Judgment forthwith and without further notice; and
9.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that

16
17
18
19

this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the
terms of this Final Judgment and the Court’s prior Order requiring Defendant to
pay the total amount due by November 26, 2012. [Docket No. 134].

20
21

The Court Orders the Defendant to pay the total amount due within ten

22

(10) days from the date of this Order. NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

23
24
25
26
27

FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED.
Dated: December 20, 2012

_________________________________
Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28

FINAL JUDGMENT
-3-