Jose Soto v. K Clark

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by Judge David O. Carter. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend. Petitioner is given 30 days to either 1) file an amended petition deleting Ground Four, or 2) file an application for a stay and abeyance. [See Order for details.] (ch)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JOSE SOTO, 11 12 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 07-4048 DOC (FFM) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Petitioner, 13 K. CLARK, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records 17 and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 18 Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and 19 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 20 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss is 21 GRANTED with leave to amend. Petitioner is given 30 days to either (1) file an 22 amended petition deleting Ground Four or (2) file an application for a stay and 23 abeyance. 24 Any such application for stay must demonstrate that: (A) there was good cause 25 for petitioner's failure to exhaust Ground Four in state courts; (B) Ground Four is 26 potentially meritorious; and (C) petitioner did not engage in intentionally dilatory 27 litigation tactics. See Rhines, 544 U.S. at 277-78. 28 / / / 1 If petitioner does apply for a stay and abeyance, respondent must file his 2 opposition (if any) to such application within 20 days of receipt thereof. 3 4 5 DATED: October 24, 2008 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 DAVID O. CARTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?