Christopher Harbridge v. Arnold Schwartzenegger et al
Filing
248
ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge George H. Wu for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 243 (sbu)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE,
16
17
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
v.
G.D. SUMPTER, et al.,
Defendants.
21
) CV 07-4486-GW (SH)
)
) ORDER ACCEPTING
) AMENDED REPORT AND
) RECOMMENDATION
) OF UNITED STATES
) MAGISTRATE JUDGE
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the Third
23
Amended Complaint and other papers along with the attached Amended Report and
24
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo
25
determination of the Amended Report and Recommendation.
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a Judgment be entered (1) approving
2
and accepting the Report and Recommendation, (2) granting Defendants’ Motion
3
for Summary Judgment as to Claims 5, 7, 8, 9, and 28; (3) dismissing Claim 23
4
without prejudice as unexhausted, and; (4) directing that Judgment be entered
5
dismissing Claims 5, 7, 8, 9, and 28.
6
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve forthwith a copy of
7
this Order and the Judgment of this date on the Plaintiff and counsel for
8
Defendants.
9
DATED: April 28, 2015
10
11
12
13
___________________________________
GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?