Christopher Harbridge v. Arnold Schwartzenegger et al

Filing 249

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to Claims 5, 7, 8, 9, and 28. Claim 23 is dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. Related to: R&R - Accepting Amended Report and Recommendations 248 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbu)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION

10
11
12
13

CHRISTOPHER HARBRIDGE,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

) CV 07-4486-GW (SH)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

v.
G. D. SUMPTER, et al.,
Defendants.

Pursuant to the Order of the Court adopting the conclusions and
recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,
IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed. Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment is granted as to Claims 5, 7, 8, 9, and 28. Claim 23 is
dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted.
DATED: April 28, 2015

25
26
27

GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1