UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 106

RESPONSE filed by Plaintiffs Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc., Universal Music - MGB NA LLC, UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music - Z Tunes LLC, Universal Music - MBG Music Publishing Ltd., Universal Music Corp.to Notice of Decision by other Court 105 (Ledahl, Brian)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 106 1 Steven A. Marenberg (101033) (smarenberg@irell.com) Elliot Brown (150802) (ebrown@irell.com) 2 Brian Ledahl (186579) (bledahl@irell.com) 3 Benjamin Glatstein (242034) (bglatstein@irell.com) IRELL & MANELLA LLP 4 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, California 90067-4276 5 Telephone: (310) 277-1010 6 Facsimile: (310) 203-7199 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UMG'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF LODGING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV-07-05744 AHM (AJWx) UMG'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF LODGING ORDER IN IO v. VEOH Hon. A. Howard Matz Date: None Time: None Courtroom: 14 Discovery Cutoff: January 12, 2009 Pretrial Conference: April 6, 2009 Trial Date: April 21, 2009 17 VEOH NETWORKS, INC., et al. Defendants. 1923090 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Plaintiffs (collectively "UMG") respectfully submit this brief response to 2 Veoh's Notice of Lodging of the summary judgment order entered in Io Group, Inc. 3 v. Veoh Networks, Inc., pending in the Northern District of California (Case No. C 4 06-3926 HRL. 5 UMG respectfully submits that Magistrate Judge Lloyd's decision in the Io 6 Group matter: (1) does not even address various critical issues presented in this 7 action, (2) to the extent it addresses issues that overlap with this case, the decision is 8 distinguishable, and (3) in any event, Magistrate Judge Lloyd's decision is incorrect 9 as a matter of law in many respects. 10 At this time, UMG does not propose to file a separate submission regarding 11 the Io Group decision. Rather, because UMG contemplates filing a Motion for 12 Partial Summary Judgment within the next week (the parties have already conferred 13 regarding UMG's anticipated motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-3 and have agreed 14 upon a briefing schedule for the motion), UMG will address these issues, as 15 necessary, in its Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of its Motion for 16 Partial Summary Judgment. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UMG'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF LODGING Dated: August 28, 2008 Respectfully Submitted, IRELL & MANELLA LLP By: /s Brian Ledahl Brian Ledahl Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1923090 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?