UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 143

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court DENIES the EX PARTE APPLICATION by Investor Defendants to Continue Hearing and Briefing Schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 134 . Defendant Veoh has an interest in defending the pending Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the resources and counsel to present fully any basis for the Court to reject that motion. The Investor Defendants have established no prejudice warranting this unusual "relief." (jp)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 143 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 07-5744 AHM (AJWx) UMG Recordings, Inc., et al. v. Veoh Networks Inc., et al. Date September 23, 2008 Present: The Honorable Stephen Montes Deputy Clerk A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Not Reported Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants: Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs: Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held) The Court DENIES the Ex Parte Application by Investor Defendants to Continue Hearing and Briefing Schedule of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.1 Defendant Veoh has an interest in defending the pending Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and the resources and counsel to present fully any basis for the Court to reject that motion. The Investor Defendants have established no prejudice warranting this unusual "relief." : Initials of Preparer SMO 1 Docket No. 134. CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1 CV-90 (06/04) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?