UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 218

ORDER RE VEOH'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLIANTIFFS AND THEIR COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE HELD IBN CONTEMPT by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich: re: APPLICATION for Order to Show Cause re: WHY PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE FOUND IN CONTEMPT FOR REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S ORDER 215 . The ex parte application is denied without prejudice. (yb)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 218 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL Case No. CV 07-5744 AHM (AJWx) Date: November 20, 2008 Title: UMG RECORDINGS, INC., et al. v. VEOH NETWORKS, INC., et al. =================================================================== PRESENT: HON. ANDREW J. WISTRICH, MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ysela Benavides Deputy Clerk ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS: None Present Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS: None Present ORDER REGARDING VEOH'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR COUNSEL SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT The ex parte application is denied without prejudice. This is not an emergency warranting ex parte relief. See Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995). However, if UMG has not already done so, UMG is directed to provide Veoh with the dates on which it will produce the witnesses in question for deposition no later than November 24, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. cc: Parties MINUTES FORM 11 CIVIL-GEN Initials of Deputy Clerk________ Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?