UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 285

UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Doc. 285

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL No. CV 07-5744-AHM(AJWx)_ Date: December 17, 2008

Title: UMG RECORDINGS, INC. VS. VEOH NETWORKS, INC., ET AL. Present: The Honorable ANDREW J. WISTRICH, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Ysela Benavides Deputy Clerk Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Steven Marenerg Brian Ledahl Benjamin Glatstein Proceedings:

CS-17-2008 Court Smart Recorder

n/a Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Defendants Rebecca Lawlor Calkins Jennifer Goinveaux Erin Ranahan

1) VEOH'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL VERIFIED INTERROGATORY RESPONSES; 2) VEOH'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO IDENTIFY WORKS AT ISSUE; 3) VEOH'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRODUCE CHAIN OF TITLE/RIGHTS INFORMATION RE ALLEGEDLY INFRINGED WORKS; 4)VEOH'S RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RELATING TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND DAMAGES; 5) VEOH'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE ADDITION OF CUSTODIANS AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND 6)UMG'S MOTION TO COMPEL RE (1)SEARCH TERMS, (2)CUSTODIANS AND (3)"SKYPE" ACCOUNTS Case called. Counsel make their appearances. Court questions counsel and listens to their responses. The parties have resolved part of Veoh's renewed motion to compel plaintiff to identify the works at issue. As stated on the record, plaintiff will serve supplemental responses to interrogatories 1, 2 and 3, and plaintiff will produce documents in response to request 26 by January 9, 2009. In addition, the deadline for plaintiff to provide a complete list of the allegedly infringed works at issue in this case is January 16, 2009. Plaintiff may seek an extension of that deadline, if necessary. To this extent, the motion is granted. All other motions are argued and submitted for decision. cc: Parties 2 Initials of Preparer yb : 43

CV-90 (12/02)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1

Dockets.Justia.com