UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 565

MINUTES OF CONTINUED HEARING ON VEOH'S MOTION TO COMPEL UMG TO PRODUCE CHAIN OF TITLE DOCUMENTS FOR THE REMAINING 80% OF IDENTIFIED COPYRIGHTS BASED ON DEFECTS ADMITTED BY UMG, ETC. held before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistric. The parties are directed to submit a revised stipulation within one week that describes the matters as to which they have agreed and delineates the issues requiring resolution by Judge Matz.Court Recorder: CS 7/20/09. (mz)

Download PDF
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Veoh Networks, Inc. et al Doc. 565 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL No. Title: CV 07-5744-AHM(AJWx) Date: July 20, 2009 UMG RECORDINGS, INC., ET AL. Vs. VEOH NETWORKS, INC., ET AL. Present: The Honorable ANDREW J. WISTRICH, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CS 07- 20-09 Ysela Benavides Deputy Clerk Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Steven Marenberg Brian Ledahl Proceedings: Court Smart N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Defendant: Jennifer Golinveaux CONTINUED HEARING ON VEOH'S MOTION TO COMPEL UMG TO PRODUCE CHAIN OF TITLE DOCUMENTS FOR THE REMAINING 80% OF IDENTIFIED COPYRIGHTS BASED ON DEFECTS ADMITTED BY UMG, ETC. Case called. Counsel make their appearances. Court questions counsel and listens to their responses. Counsel are directed to meet and confer during a recess and see if they can make progress on resolving their remaining differences. LATER AND ON THE RECORD: The parties report they have made progress on resolving the remaining issues and place their agreement on the record. The parties are directed to submit a revised stipulation within one week that describes the matters as to which they have agreed and delineates the issues requiring resolution by Judge Matz . cc: Parties : Initials of Preparer yb 35 CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?