Kathy Ransom v. Accor North America, Inc et al

Filing 20

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Gary A. Feess, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 19 . Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal submitted by Defendants, ACCORNORTH AMERICA, INC., and MOTEL 6 OPERATING LP, erroneously named asMOTEL 6 COOPERATING LP, and Plaintiff, Kathy Ransom, the above-captionedaction is hereby dismissed with prejudice. (rrey)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, MOTEL 6 Cooperating LP AND DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive. Defendants. Complaint Filed: July 30, 2007 Date Removed: September 5, 2007 Hon. Judge Gary A. Feess KATHY RANSOM Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CV 07-5769 GAF (SHx) ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP MARIJA T. MARINO (State Bar No. 189059) E. CLIFF MARTIN (State Bar No. 227367) 550 South Hope Street, Suite 2000 Los Angeles, California 90071-2627 Telephone: 213 · 532 · 2000 Facsimile: 213 · 532 · 2020 E-mail: martinec@hunton.com Attorneys for Defendants, ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., and MOTEL 6 OPERATING LP, erroneously named as MOTEL 6 COOPERATING LP THE CLAYPOOL LAW FIRM, A PROF. CORP. BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL (State Bar No. 134674) The US Bank Tower 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 5880 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone : 213-488-2042 Facsimile : 213-489-4798 Email : becesq@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff, KATHY RANSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal submitted by Defendants, ACCOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., and MOTEL 6 OPERATING LP, erroneously named as MOTEL 6 COOPERATING LP, and Plaintiff, Kathy Ransom, the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATE: October 2, 2008 ________________________________ Honorable Gary A. Feess United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?