Diamond Game Enterprises v. Jackpot Promotions et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE has proven all of the elements of all of its claims alleged in the Complaint against Defendants. Accordingly, DGE is hereby declared the prevailing party on all of its cla ims against Defendants and judgment should be and hereby is entered in favor of DGE and against Defendants on the merits on all claims for relief alleged in DGE's Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE shall recover from Defen dants, and each of them, damages in the total amount of $237,718.00. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE shall additionally recover from Defendants, and each of them, its costs of suit incurred herein in the sum of ___. FURTHER ORDERE D, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT, pursuant to California Civil Code § 3289, DGE shall additionally recover from Defendants, and each of them, statutory prejudgment interest of 10% per annum on $237,718.00 in the amount of $53,797.69. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the total amount of this Judgment shall bear post-judgment interest of $10.00 per day pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) from the date of the entry of this Judgment until it is satisfied in full. Related to: MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's sole cause of action 35 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Dean A. Martoccia (SBN 193185) 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3300 Los Angeles, California 90067-3063 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 Email: dmartoccia@seyfarth.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DIAMOND GAME ENTERPRISES, INC. JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION DIAMOND GAME ENTERPRISES, INC. Plaintiff, v. JACKPOT PROMOTIONS, LLC, RIVERS FENNELL, DAVID PETTY and JOSEPH STEVENSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 07-6239 JFW (JWJx) (JUDGE JOHN F. WALTER, CTRM 16) JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the Court, having considered Plaintiff Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc.'s ("DGE") unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") as against Defendants RIVERS FENNELL, DAVID PETTY, and JOSEPH STEVENSON (collectively, "Defendants"), and having granted Plaintiff's Motion in its entirety; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE has proven all of the elements of all of its claims alleged in the Complaint against Defendants. Accordingly, DGE is hereby declared the prevailing party on all of its claims against Defendants and judgment should be and hereby is entered in favor of DGE and against Defendants on the merits on all claims for relief alleged in DGE's Complaint. 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT LA1 6734548.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE shall recover from Defendants, and each of them, damages in the total amount of $237,718.00. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE shall additionally recover from Defendants, and each of them, its costs of suit incurred herein in the sum of _____________. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT, pursuant to California Civil Code § 3289, DGE shall additionally recover from Defendants, and each of them, statutory prejudgment interest of 10% per annum on $237,718.00 in the amount of $53,797.69. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the total amount of this Judgment shall bear post-judgment interest of $10.00 per day pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) from the date of the entry of this Judgment until it is satisfied in full. Pursuant to Central District Local Rule 58-7, a memorandum respecting the computation of interest is attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 22, 2008 Honorable John F. Walter United States District Judge 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT LA1 6734548.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA1 6734548.1 Attachment A MEMORANDUM OF POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST PURSUANT TO CENTRAL DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 58-7 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(a), "[i]nterest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court." Such interest is "calculated from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the calendar week preceding the date of the judgment." Pursuant to Section 1961(b), such interest is to be computed daily to the date of payment and shall be compounded annually. Plaintiff Diamond Game Enterprises, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion for Summary Judgment as against Defendants RIVERS FENNELL, DAVID PETTY, and JOSEPH STEVENSON (collectively, "Defendants") was granted by the Court in its entirety the week of October 13, 2008. For the week preceding October 13, 2008 - i.e., the week ending October 10, 2008 ­ the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield published by the Federal Reserve System was 1.24%. Section 1961 applies to awards of attorneys' fees and costs. Friend v. Kolodzieczak, 72 F.3d 1386, 1391 (9th Cir. 1995) (". . . [I]t follows that costs, as part of the same judgment, are also covered by the post-judgment interest statute."); Spain v. Mountanos, 690 F.2d 742, 747-48 (9th Cir. 1982) (application to fee and cost award in Section 1988 case); R.W.T. v. Dalton, 712 F.2d 1225, 1234-35 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1009, 78 L.Ed.2d 710, 104 S.Ct. 527 (1983) (awarding interest on both fees and costs). Accordingly, the amount of post-judgment interest per day on Plaintiff's damages ($237,718.00), costs ($2,864.83), and pre-judgment interest ($53,797.69), which total $294,380.52, is $10.00. 5 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?