Harold Walsh v. County of San Luis Obispo et al

Filing 35

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff take nothing and that his federal causes of action against the individual defendants and each of them, be dismissed on the merits; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's federal causes of action against the County of San Luis Obispo and its named departments be dismissed; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's state law claims be dismissed on the basis of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (mg)

2530.31633 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

CLAYTON U. HALL, ESQ./S.B. #88535 MOLLY E. THURMOND, ESQ./S.B. #104973 HALL, HIEATT & CONNELY, LLP 1319 Marsh Street, Second Floor San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

CLOSED

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION HAROLD WALSH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO; ) SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ) SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; ) ANIMAL SERVICES; ERIC ) ANDERSON, DIRECTOR OF SAN ) LUIS OBISPO COUNTY ANIMAL ) SERVICES; PAT HEDGES, ) SHERIFF; STEVE BOLTS, ) UNDERSHERIFF, AND DOES 1 - ) 50, ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. CV 07-07133 RGK (AGRx) [Assigned to Honorable R. Gary Klausner ] JUDGMENT

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, set for hearing on September 8, 2008, was taken under submission by the Court, the Honorable R. Gary Klausner presiding. The Court having fully considered the submitted pleadings, the issues, evidence and arguments therein and a decision having been duly rendered on September 25, 2008, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff take nothing and that his federal causes of action against the individual defendants and each of them, be dismissed on the merits;
1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's federal causes of action against the County of San Luis Obispo and its named departments be dismissed; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's state law claims be dismissed on the basis of lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dated: October 7, 2008 ____________________________________ HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

2