Gerardo Ortega et al v. J. B. Hunt Transport, Inc. et al

Filing 172

JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that basedon this Courts October 2, 2013 and June 4, 2014 Orders as referenced above,Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their operative First Amended C omplaint and judgment shall be and hereby is entered in Defendant's favor as to all causes of action asserted against it in this action. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ADJUDGED that Defendant may seek to recover costs pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Central District Local Rule 54-1, et seq.IT IS SO ORDERED 169 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rfi)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

J. KEVIN LILLY, Bar No. 119981
[e-mail]
SCOTT M. LIDMAN, Bar No. 199433
[e-mail]
DIANE L. KIMBERLIN, Bar No. 071487
[e-mail]
FATEMEH S. MASHOUF, Bar No. 288667
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
Telephone: [phone]
Fax No.:
310.553.5583
Attorneys for Defendant
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

13
14
15
16

GERARDO ORTEGA, ALFREDO
SALVATIERRA and MICHAEL D.
PATTON, individually and on behalf
of themselves, all others similarly
situated, and the general public,
Plaintiffs,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308

Case No. 2:07-cv-08336-BRO-FMOx
Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell
JUDGMENT ENTERED IN FAVOR
OF DEFENDANT J.B. HUNT
TRANSPORT, INC.

v.
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., an
Arkansas corporation; and DOES 1
to 100, inclusive,
Defendant.

Complaint Filed: November 19, 2007

1

After full consideration of the papers, evidence, and authorities submitted by

2

the parties and in the Court’s files, as well as the parties’ oral argument thereon, on

3

October 2, 2013, this Court issued an order granting Defendant J.B. Hunt Transport,

4

Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the meal and rest and

5

related claims of Plaintiffs Gerardo Ortega and Michael Patton (collectively,

6

“Plaintiffs”). (See Docket Entry, Document No. 124).

7

After full consideration of the papers, evidence, and authorities submitted by

8

the parties and in the Court’s files, as well as the parties’ oral argument thereon, on

9

June 4, 2014, this Court issued an order granting Defendant’s Motion For Summary

10

Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ remaining claims. (See Docket Entry, Document No. 168):

11

BASED ON THE FOREGOING, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that based

12

on this Court’s October 2, 2013 and June 4, 2014 Orders as referenced above,

13

Plaintiffs shall take nothing by way of their operative First Amended Complaint and

14

judgment shall be and hereby is entered in Defendant’s favor as to all causes of action

15

asserted against it in this action.

16

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ADJUDGED that Defendant may seek to recover

17

costs pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Central District

18

Local Rule 54-1, et seq.

19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2014

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308

By:
HON. BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL
United States District Court Judge