-SH Peter Johnson et al v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 223

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJDUDICE, WITH RETENTION OF JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT IF NECESSARY by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between the Parties, (see, Docket No. 210.2), the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice with the Court retaining jurisdiction over this action to enforce, if necessary, compliance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. (vv)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

CLOSED

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18

PETER JOHNSON, DONALD
PETERSON, MICHAEL CURFMAN,
ANDRE BUTLER, JOE GONZALEZ,
COLUMBUS GRIGSBY, and
DERRICK WHITE
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,

19
20

Case No. CV 08-03515 DDP (SHx)
Honorable Dean D. Pregerson
ORDER
DISMISSING CASE, WITH
PREJDUDICE, WITH
RETENTION OF
JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE
THE SETTLEMENT IF
NECESSARY

Plaintiffs,
vs.

21
22
23
24
25
26

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, a public
entity; JIM MCDONNELL, as Sheriff of
the County of Los Angeles and
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a public
entity,
Defendants

27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between the Parties, (see, Docket No.

4

210.2), the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice with the

5

Court retaining jurisdiction over this action to enforce, if necessary,

6

compliance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

DATED: June 08, 2015
The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
2