Yolanda Crews et al v. Domino's Pizza Corp. et al

Filing 362

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, in favor of Domino's Pizza, LLC against Feliciano Cano PURSUANT to FRCP Rule 58. Related to: REQUEST for Judgment Against Plaintiff Feliciano Cano 361 . (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

YOLANDA CREWS, DAVE NGUYEN,
FELICIANO CANO, DUY NGUYEN,
JOHN YEGHIAYN, DUKE LE, HUGO
URIBIO, DARMAWAN
GANDASETIAWAN, AND MARK
STRAWN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DOMINO’S PIZZA CORP., a corporation, )
DOMINO’S PIZZA LLC, a Michigan
)
Limited Liability Corporation;
)
DOMINO’S PIZZA CALIFORNIA, LLC, )
a California Limited Liability Corporation, )
and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No.: 2:08-CV-3703 JST (SSx)

JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF
FELICIANO CANO PURSUANT TO
FRCP RULE 58

23
24
25

TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN:
Pursuant to FRCP Rule 58 and in accordance with the jury verdict rendered on

26
27
28

July 29, 2011 (Doc. 294), and the Order Regarding Court’s Findings on Plaintiff
Feliciano Cano’s Equitable Claims (Doc. 349), judgment is entered in favor of Domino’s

-1-

1

Pizza, LLC and against Plaintiff Feliciano Cano on each of the claims remaining in the

2

action.

3
The Court concludes that Defendant, Domino’s Pizza, LLC is the prevailing party
4
on Plaintiff Feliciano Cano’s action against it.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED:
7
8

Dated:January 25, 2012

___________________________
Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-