Associated Tax Relief Holding Inc v. Milkyway Marketing, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Gary A. Feess, granting Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 28 with prejudice. (rrey)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// 1. v. MILKYWAY MARKETING, INC.; REVENUE DEVELOPMENT INC.; CINDY BOND; TRACY CARLSON; SHARON MORGAN; and DOES 1 10, inclusive, , Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATED TAX RELIEF, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. CV08-04247 GAF (JWJx)

JS-6

ORDER: MUTUAL STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) & (c)
Courtroom: Judge: Magistrate Judge: Complaint Filed: Trial Date: G-8 Hon. Gary A. Feess Hon. Jeffrey W. Johnson 05/15/08 None set

Pursuant to the MUTUAL STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS

AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE, it is HEREBY ordered that the dismissal with prejudice of the Complaint and Counterclaim is GRANTED as follows:
The Complaint filed by Plaintiff ASSOCIATED TAX RELIEF against Defendants TRACY CARLSON, SHARON MORGAN, and MILKY WAY MARKETING, INC. is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

-1ORDER REGARDING MUTUAL STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
KLINEDINST PC 777 S. FIGUEROA ST., 47TH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017

2.

The Counterclaim filed by Defendant MILKYWAY MARKETING, INC., against Plaintiff ASSOCIATED TAX RELIEF is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: March 5, 2009

By:

HONORABLE GARY A. FEESS Judge of the U.S. District Court

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MUTUAL STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE