Sony BMG Music Entertainment et al v. John Doe

Filing 13

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than 1/21/2009, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Cour t will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. Plaintiffs'service of First Amended Complaint. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)

SCAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 08-5024-RSWL (AGRx) Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. John Doe Date January 13, 2009

Present: The Honorable Kelly Davis Deputy Clerk

RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior, U.S. District Court Judge Not Present Court Reporter / Recorder n/a Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Proceedings:

Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present

IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

It is the responsibility of plaintiff to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiff(s) must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court, Local Rule 7-1. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than January 21, 2009, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. ·

Plaintiffs' service of 1st amended complaint

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.

: Initials of Preparer KD

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1