Margaret Morris v. Kenneth Atchity et al

Filing 242

ORDER Re: Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record Without Substitution 233 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Plaintiff's counsel requests that the Court allow for the withdrawal of K. Brian Matlock and Anne-Leith Matlock. Pursuant to the Courts ruling on February 24, 2012, all attorneys of record for Plaintiff have already been terminated, and Plaintiff is currently pro se 232 . Therefore, the present Motion is DENIED as moot. (lom)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 MARGARET MORRIS, an
individual
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14

18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19

Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Margaret

15
KENNETH ATCHITY, et al.,
16
17

Defendants.

CV 08-5321-RSWL (JCx)
ORDER Re: Motion to
Withdraw as Counsel of
Record Without
Substitution [233]

20 Morris’s (“Plaintiff”) Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw as
21 Counsel of Record Without Substitution [233].

The

22 Court having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining
23 to this Motion, NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS:
24

Plaintiff’s counsel requests that the Court allow

25 for the withdrawal of K. Brian Matlock and Anne-Leith
26 Matlock.

Pursuant to the Court’s ruling on February

27 24, 2012, all attorneys of record for Plaintiff have
28 already been terminated, and Plaintiff is currently pro
1

1 se [232].

Therefore, the present Motion is DENIED as

2 moot.
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 DATED: March 13 , 2012.
6
7
8

HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW
Senior, U.S. District Court Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2