Jackson Browne v. John McCain et al

Filing 74

First AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th CIRCUIT filed by Defendant John McCain. Amending Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 59 Filed On: March 10, 2009; (Bandlow, Lincoln)

Download PDF
Jackson Browne v. John McCain et al Doc. 74 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lincoln D. Bandlow (SBN 170449) LATHROP & GAGE LLP 1880 Century Park East, Suite 1004 Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 789-4600 Fax: (310) 789-4601 Email: lbandlow@lathropgage.com Attorneys for Defendant JOHN MCCAIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JACKSON BROWNE, an individual Plaintiff, vs. JOHN MCCAIN, an individual; THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, a non-profit political organization; THE OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY; a non-profit political organization, Defendants. CASE NO. CV08-05334 RGK (Ex) USCA9 No. 09-55357 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John McCain ("Defendant"), one of the defendants herein, appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit from the Order of the District Court denying Defendant's Motion to Strike made pursuant to Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 425.16 (the "Anti-SLAPP Motion"). The denial of the Anti-SLAPP motion is immediately appealable pursuant to the collateral order doctrine. See e.g., Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1024-26 (9th Cir. 2003); Zamani v. Carnes, 491 F.3d 990, 994 (9th Cir. 2007). Dated: March 20, 2009 LATHROP & GAGE LLP By: Lincoln D. Bandlow Attorneys for Defendant JOHN MCCAIN ________________________________________________________________________________ DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?