Crescencio Galvez et al v. Touch-Tel U.S.A., L.P.

Filing 251

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Opposition to Motion for Order Prelimarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Should Not Be Stricken by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/16/2013. (rne)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 08-5642 RGK (JCx) Date May 10, 2013 Title CRESCENCIO GALVEZ et al v. TOUCH-TEL U.S.A., L.P. dba TOUCH-TEL USA, LLC Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Sharon L. Williams (Not Present) Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Proceedings: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Opposition to Motion for Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Should not be Stricken On April 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Joint Motion for Entry of Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Program. Objectors Cecilia Ibanez, Jose Baltazar, Mitjavila Ochoa, and the Proposed California Class in LASC BC488697 (“Objectors”) filed an Opposition to the motion. Court records indicate that no class has been certified. Court records also indicate that Objectors are not direct parties or parties in intervention to the current action. As such, the Court orders Objectors to show cause in writing no later than May 16, 2013, why the opposition should not be stricken as an improper filing. Objectors’ response shall not exceed 5 pages in length. Parties to the action may also file a response, subject to the same deadline and page limitations. IT IS SO ORDERED. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (10/08) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?