Crescencio Galvez et al v. Touch-Tel U.S.A., L.P.
Filing
251
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Opposition to Motion for Order Prelimarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Should Not Be Stricken by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/16/2013. (rne)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 08-5642 RGK (JCx)
Date
May 10, 2013
Title
CRESCENCIO GALVEZ et al v. TOUCH-TEL U.S.A., L.P. dba TOUCH-TEL USA,
LLC
Present: The Honorable
R. GARY KLAUSNER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Sharon L. Williams (Not Present)
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Not Present
Proceedings:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
(IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Opposition to Motion for Order
Preliminarily Approving Settlement and Class Notice Should not be Stricken
On April 22, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Joint Motion for Entry of Order Preliminarily Approving
Settlement and Class Notice Program. Objectors Cecilia Ibanez, Jose Baltazar, Mitjavila Ochoa, and the
Proposed California Class in LASC BC488697 (“Objectors”) filed an Opposition to the motion.
Court records indicate that no class has been certified. Court records also indicate that Objectors
are not direct parties or parties in intervention to the current action. As such, the Court orders Objectors
to show cause in writing no later than May 16, 2013, why the opposition should not be stricken as an
improper filing. Objectors’ response shall not exceed 5 pages in length. Parties to the action may also
file a response, subject to the same deadline and page limitations.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?