Pom Wonderful LLC v. The Coca Cola Company et al

Filing 376

FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant The Coca-Cola Company and against plaintiff Pom Wonderful LLC (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1 ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 047109) [e-mail] 2 LAW OFFICES OF ALLEN RUBY 125 South Market Street, Suite 1001 3 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 408-998-8503 5 ANDREW S. CLARE (SBN 050289) [e-mail] 6 LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200 7 Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 9 DANIEL SILVERMAN (SBN 137864) [e-mail] 10 KRISTINA M. DIAZ (SBN 151566) [e-mail] 11 DANIEL A. BECK (SBN 204496) [e-mail] 12 ROLL LAW GROUP P.C. 11444 West Olympic Blvd., 10th Floor 13 Los Angeles, California 90064-1557 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 310-966-8810

NELSON L. ATKINS (SBN 036752) [e-mail] KENNETH M. JONES (SBN 140358) [e-mail] GONZALEZ SAGGIO & HARLAN LLP 3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 890 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] STEVEN A. ZALESIN (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] TRAVIS J. TU (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP 1133 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant THE COCA-COLA COMPANY

JS-6 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff POM WONDERFUL LLC 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 POM WONDERFUL LLC, a Delaware ) Case No. CV-08-06237 SJO (FMOx) 19 limited liability company, ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT 20 ) Plaintiff, ) Hon. S. James Otero 21 ) v. ) 22 THE COCA COLA COMPANY, a ) Delaware corporation; and DOES 1-10, ) 23 inclusive, ) ) 24 ) Defendants. ) 25 ) ) 26

27 28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
{039418.2}

1 2

WHEREAS: The Court has reviewed the Amended [Proposed] Pretrial Conference Order

3 ("PTCO") filed by Plaintiff Pom Wonderful LLC ("Plaintiff") and Defendant The 4 Coca-Cola Company ("Defendant"); 5 The Court has issued its Order Granting In Part, Denying In Part Defendant's 6 Motion For Summary Judgment Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 56; Denying Plaintiff's 7 Motion For Partial Summary Adjudication Re: Defendant's Affirmative Defenses 8 Of Safe Harbor And Compliance with Laws, entered on May 5, 2010 [Docket No. 9 360] (the "MSJ Order"); 10 The MSJ Order dismissed Plaintiff's state law claims. The MSJ Order also 11 "precluded [Plaintiff] from pursuing its Lanham Act claim against the naming and 12 labeling on the Juice's bottle," MSJ Order at 33, and "precluded [Plaintiff] from 13 pursuing its Lanham Act claim against the Fruit Vignette." Id. at 36. The MSJ 14 Order did not preclude Plaintiff from pursuing its Lanham Act claim in other 15 respects; 16 Plaintiff stipulates that, in light of the Court's MSJ Order, it cannot now carry 17 its burden with respect to its Lanham Act claim and that, accordingly, the Court 18 should dismiss with prejudice the remaining portion of Plaintiff's Lanham Act claim 19 and enter Final Judgment for Defendant in this action with respect to all claims; 20 Plaintiff has expressly reserved its right to appeal this Final Judgment and the 21 Court's prior orders in this matter including, but not limited to, the MSJ Order; 22 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT final judgment is hereby 23 entered in favor of Defendant The Coca-Cola Company. 24 25 Dated: May 24, 2010 26 27 28 By:_______________________________________ Hon. S. James Otero United States District Judge 1
{039418.2}

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT

1 Respectfully submitted by: 2 ROLL LAW GROUP P.C. 3 By: /s/ Daniel S. Silverman 4 Daniel S. Silverman Attorneys for Plaintiff 5 POM WONDERFUL LLC 6 7 PATTERSON BELKNAP WEBB & TYLER LLP

/s/ Steven A. Zalesin 8 By: Steven A. Zalesin 9 Attorneys for Defendant THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
{039418.2}

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT