United States of America et al v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

Filing 102

JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) by Judge George H. King: Pursuant to our January 30, 2012 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Counts I-III of the Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), we expressly determine that there is no just reason for delay, and we therefore direct entry of this judgment. (bm)

1
2
3
4

FILED: 5/24/12

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
ex rel. GERALDINE GODECKE, )
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
_______________________________ )

CASE NO. CV 08-6403-GHK (AGRx)
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 54(b)

Pursuant to our January 30, 2012 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that
Counts I-III of the Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. Pursuant to Fed. R.
Civ. P. 54(b), we expressly determine that there is no just reason for delay, and we
therefore direct entry of this judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 24, 2012
_______________________________
GEORGE H. KING
United States District Judge