MRM Jewelry, Inc. v. Mousa Shans, et al

Filing 55

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Gary A. Feess, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 54 . Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, this action, inclusive of the complaint and all counterclaims, is hereby Ordered Dismissed in its entirety without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The parties shall bear their own costs, attorneys fees and experts fees. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (rrey)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MRM JEWELRY, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. MOUSA SHANS an individual dba Oro Star and dba Shans Jewelry; LA. SHANS JEWELRY, INC., a California corporation dba Oro Star and dba Shans Jewelry and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. _____________________________. MOUSA SHANS, an individual and LA. SHANS JEWELRY, INC., a California Corporation, dba SHANS JEWELRY and ORO STAR, Counterclaimants vs. MRM JEWELRY, INC., a California Corporation, Counterdefendant. Case No. CV08-06900 GAF (MANx) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the stipulation between the parties, this action, inclusive of the complaint and all counterclaims, is hereby Ordered Dismissed in its entirety without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The parties shall bear their own costs, attorneys' fees and experts' fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 15, 2009 By:_________________________________ Hon. Gary Allen Fees United States District Court Judge 2 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?