ExxonMobil Oil Corporation v. Gasprom Inc. et al

Filing 115

JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of ExxonMobil Oil Corporation against Gasprom Inc.: It is now Ordered and Adjudged as follows: ExxonMobil shall recover from Gasprom compensatory damages in the sum of $3,700; Gasprom is permanentl y enjoined from doing any or all of the following: (see document for further details). Gasprom's counterclaim shall be dismissed in its entirety on the merits with prejudice; ExxonMobil is entitled to recover its costs of suit from Gasprom; ExxonMobil is entitled to recover from Gasprom its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses from Gasprom. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (bm)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Case No. CV-08-07259 PSG (Ex) Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT E-FILED 03/26/10 JS-6

18 GASPROM INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 23 24 25 26 27 28

Trial Date: March 9, 2010 Time: 9:30 a.m. Ctrm: 790

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

LEGAL02/31808026v1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and, /// /// /// /// /// following:

Following the Court's having previously granted Plaintiff ExxonMobil Oil Corporation's ("ExxonMobil") motion for summary judgment to dismiss Defendant Gasprom Inc.'s (`Gasprom") counterclaim, this civil action came on regularly for trial to the Court, a jury having been waived, the issues were duly tried, a decision was rendered and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were made. It is now Ordered and Adjudged as follows: 1. 2. ExxonMobil shall recover from Gasprom compensatory damages Gasprom is permanently enjoined from doing any or all of the a. proceeding further in any way with its renovation project at in the sum of $3,700;

the service station located at 3995 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Westlake, Village, California ("Marketing Premises") as contemplated by Minor Modification Permit No. SUP 2007-70257; b. removing, remodeling, relocating, altering or modifying any improvements or equipment owned by ExxonMobil and located at the Marketing Premises without ExxonMobil's prior written approval; and c. 3. 4. conspiring or collaborating with any other person to undertake any act proscribed in subsections 2 (a) and 2 (b) above; Gasprom's counterclaim shall be dismissed in its entirety on the ExxonMobil is entitled to recover its costs of suit from Gasprom; merits with prejudice;

1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

LEGAL02/31808026v1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

5.

ExxonMobil is entitled to recover from Gasprom its reasonable

attorneys fees and expenses from Gasprom in the sum of $_____________________.

03/26/10 Dated:__________________

_______________________________ Phillip S. Gutierrez United States District Judge

Submitted by: Dated: March 24, 2010 JOHN M. ROCHEFORT MARTHA S. DOTY ALSTON & BIRD LLP CRAIG J. WHITNEY EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION /s/ John M. Rochefort John M. Rochefort Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION

2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

LEGAL02/31808026v1