ExxonMobil Oil Corporation v. Gasprom Inc. et al

Filing 133

NUNC PRO TUNC JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of ExxonMobil Oil Corporation against Gasprom Inc.: It is now Ordered and Adjudged as follows: ExxonMobil shall recover from Gasprom compensatory damages in the sum of $3,700; Gasprom is permanently enjoined from doing any or all of thefollowing: (see document for further details). Gasprom's counterclaim shall be dismissed in its entirety on the merits with prejudice. ExxonMobil is entitled to recover its costs of suit from Gasprom in the amount of $8,963.25. ExxonMobil is entitled to recover from Gasprom its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses from Gasprom in the sum of $297,991.50. Nunc pro tunc to 03/26/10. (bm)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Case No. CV-08-07259 PSG (Ex) Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
NUNC PRO TUNC

E-FILED 06/07/10 JS-6

18 GASPROM INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM. 23 24 25 26 27 28

Trial Date: March 9, 2010 Time: 9:30 a.m. Ctrm: 790

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

LEGAL02/31808026v1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 and, /// /// /// /// /// following:

Following the Court's having previously granted Plaintiff ExxonMobil Oil Corporation's ("ExxonMobil") motion for summary judgment to dismiss Defendant Gasprom Inc.'s (`Gasprom") counterclaim, this civil action came on regularly for trial to the Court, a jury having been waived, the issues were duly tried, a decision was rendered and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were made. It is now Ordered and Adjudged as follows: 1. 2. ExxonMobil shall recover from Gasprom compensatory damages Gasprom is permanently enjoined from doing any or all of the a. proceeding further in any way with its renovation project at in the sum of $3,700;

the service station located at 3995 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Westlake, Village, California ("Marketing Premises") as contemplated by Minor Modification Permit No. SUP 2007-70257; b. removing, remodeling, relocating, altering or modifying any improvements or equipment owned by ExxonMobil and located at the Marketing Premises without ExxonMobil's prior written approval; and c. 3. 4. conspiring or collaborating with any other person to undertake any act proscribed in subsections 2 (a) and 2 (b) above; Gasprom's counterclaim shall be dismissed in its entirety on the ExxonMobil is entitled to recover its costs of suit from Gasprom;
in the amount of $8,963.25;

merits with prejudice;

1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Error! Unknown document property name.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

5.
6.

ExxonMobil is entitled to recover from Gasprom its reasonable
Nunc pro tunc to 03/26/10.

297, 991.50; attorneys fees and expenses from Gasprom in the sum of $_____________________.

06/07/10 Dated:__________________

_______________________________ Phillip S. Gutierrez United States District Judge

Submitted by: Dated: March 24, 2010 JOHN M. ROCHEFORT MARTHA S. DOTY ALSTON & BIRD LLP CRAIG J. WHITNEY EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION /s/ John M. Rochefort John M. Rochefort Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION

2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

LEGAL02/31808026v1