Daniel D. Dydzak v. State of California et al
Filing
50
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Pursuant to the order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted; (2) the claims for non-monetary relief are dismissed without prejudice based on Younger abstention; and (3) the claims for monetary relief are dismissed with prejudice. 48 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: February 26, 2009 __________________________________ VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendant(s). DANIEL D. DYDZAK, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 08-7765-VAP (AGR) JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Pursuant to the order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted; (2) the claims for non-monetary relief are dismissed without prejudice based on Younger abstention; and (3) the claims for monetary relief are dismissed with prejudice.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
