Robert G. Perrin et al v. Southwest Water Company et al

Filing 196

JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. In accordance with the Order denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint and granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 189 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that jud gment is entered in favor of Defendants SouthWest Water Company, Anton C. Garnier, Mark A. Swatek, Cheryl L. Clary, and Peter J. Moerbeek, and against Plaintiffs The Hemmer Group, Joseph Yeatte, Thomas Moshier, and Howard Fosman. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that Defendants SouthWest Water Company, Anton C. Garnier, Mark A. Swatek, Cheryl L. Clary and Peter J. Moerbeek are the prevailing party entitled to recover costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and Local Rules 54-2 and 54-4. In compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(c)(1), the Court finds that the above mentioned Defendants and Plaintiffs, and their respective counsel, have complied with the requirements of Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (lom)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT G. PERRIN, et al.,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,
v.
SOUTHWEST WATER CO., et al.,
Defendants.

)
) Case No. CV 08-7844 DMG (AGRx)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1-

1

In accordance with the Order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File an

2

Amended Complaint and granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #

3

189],

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment is

5

entered in favor of Defendants SouthWest Water Company, Anton C. Garnier, Mark A.

6

Swatek, Cheryl L. Clary, and Peter J. Moerbeek, and against Plaintiffs The Hemmer

7

Group, Joseph Yeatte, Thomas Moshier, and Howard Fosman.

8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants SouthWest Water Company, Anton

9

C. Garnier, Mark A. Swatek, Cheryl L. Clary and Peter J. Moerbeek are the prevailing

10

party entitled to recover costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d) and

11

Local Rules 54-2 and 54-4.

12
13
14

In compliance with 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(c)(1), the Court finds that the abovementioned Defendants and Plaintiffs, and their respective counsel, have complied with
the requirements of Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

15
16
17

DATED:

July 30, 2014

18
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-