Kapa Investment v. Cirrus Design Corporation et al

Filing 241

JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: This action was tried by a jury, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict in favor of defendants Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. and Cirrus Design Corporation.It is ordered that : (1) Plaintiff Kapa Investment recover nothing and that the action be dismissed on the merits; (2) Defendant Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. shall recover from Plaintiff Kapa Investment costs of suit as a prevailing party pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54, Local Rule 54-3 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the sum of $__________________________; and (3) Defendant Cirrus Design Corporation shall recover from Plaintiff Kapa Investment costs of suit as a prevailing party pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54, Local Rule 54-3 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the sum of $__________________________.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E-FILED 11-18-09 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAPA INVESTMENT, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION; TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS; GARMIN INTERNATIONAL; L-3 COMMUNICATIONS AVIONICS; STEC, INC.; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: CV08-8446 PSG (JCx) JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] This action was tried by a jury, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict in favor of defendants Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. and Cirrus Design Corporation. It is ordered that: (1) (2) Plaintiff Kapa Investment recover nothing and that the action be Defendant Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc. shall recover from dismissed on the merits; Plaintiff Kapa Investment costs of suit as a prevailing party pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54, JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Local Rule 54-3 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the sum of $__________________________; and (3) Defendant Cirrus Design Corporation shall recover from Plaintiff Kapa Investment costs of suit as a prevailing party pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54, Local Rule 54-3 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 in the sum of $__________________________. DATED: November ____, 2009 18 PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?