Khaled Al Hassen v. Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan et al

Filing 76

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT'S 3/3/2011 ORDER SHOULD NOT BE VACATED AND SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT SHEIKH MOHAMED QUASHED by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 2/24/2011, the United States filed a Statement of Interest 75 . The Go vernment requests that the Court vacate its 3/3/2011 Order re Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process by Alternative Methods 19 and invalidate service upon Defendant Sheikh Mohamed. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Cou rt should not grant the relief requested by the Government. Plaintiff shall file his response on or before 3/14/2011. Plaintiff should address both the merits of the Governments position and, in the event the Court grants the relief requested, whether he intends to serve Defendant Sheikh Mohamed by alternative means. If the Government wishes to file a reply brief, it should do so on or before 3/28/2011. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

Khaled Al Hassen v. Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan et al

Doc. 76

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL Case No. CV 09-01106 DMG (FMOx) Date February 28, 2011 Page 1 of 1

Title Khaled Al Hassen v. Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, et al. Present: The Honorable

DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NOT REPORTED Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present

VALENCIA VALLERY Deputy Clerk Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS--ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT'S MARCH 3, 2011 ORDER SHOULD NOT BE VACATED AND SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT SHEIKH MOHAMED QUASHED On February 24, 2011, the United States filed a Statement of Interest. The Government takes the position that service on Defendant Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan ("Defendant Sheikh Mohamed") through the United Arab Emirates Ambassador and military attaché was improper and inconsistent with obligations of the United States under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. The Government requests that the Court vacate its March 3, 2011 Order re Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Process by Alternative Methods [Doc. #19] and invalidate service upon Defendant Sheikh Mohamed. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not grant the relief requested by the Government. Plaintiff shall file his response on or before March 14, 2011. Plaintiff should address both the merits of the Government's position and, in the event the Court grants the relief requested, whether he intends to serve Defendant Sheikh Mohamed by alternative means. If the Government wishes to file a reply brief, it should do so on or before March 28, 2011. IT IS SO ORDERED.

CV-90

CIVIL MINUTES--GENERAL

Initials of Deputy Clerk vv

Dockets.Justia.com