Compton Unified School District v. A. F. et al

Filing 51

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge A. Howard Matz, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 50 . (kbr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 BARRETT K. GREEN, Bar No. 145393 DANIEL L. GONZALEZ, Bar No. 223517 LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107 Telephone: 310.553.0308 Facsimile: 310.553.5583 E-mail: bgreen@littler.com; dlgonzalez@littler.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter Defendant COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT LEEJANICE TOBACK, Bar No. 194211 LAW OFFICES OF LEEJANICE TOBACK 1520 Palos Verdes Drive West Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 Telephone: (310) 465-0202 Facsimile: (310) 697-3504 E-mail: kidslaw@msn.com Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs A.F., A MINOR STUDENT, W and S.F. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 16 17 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, 18 19 20 21 Case No. CV09-01427 AHM (CWx) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE v. A.F., A MINOR STUDENT, W and S.F., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. 22 23 The Court having considered the parties’ Stipulation Dismissing Action 24 With Prejudice filed and served concurrently herewith, and good cause appearing 25 therefore, 26 HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES THAT: 27 1. 28 The entire action shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice; 1 2. Each party shall bear its/his/her/their own attorneys’ fees and costs in 2 connection with the prosecution and defense of this action (except for the attorneys’ 3 fees provided for in the settlement agreement); and 4 5 6 3. The district court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: April 25, 2011 9 10 11 HON. A. HOWARD MATZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?