Gail Hodes et al v. Van's International Foods et al
Filing
96
JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner: On September 9, 2009, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Lack of Jurisdiction. In light of its Order Denying Class Certification, the Court ordered Defendants to respond in writing why the action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Upon review of the facts, the Court found dismissal proper based lack of complete diversity. Therefore, on September 30, 2009, the Courtdismissed the action in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) VAN'S INTERNATIONAL FOODS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) GAIL HODES, et al.,
CLOSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. CV 09-01530-RGK (FFMx)
JUDGMENT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
On September 9, 2009, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re Lack of Jurisdiction. In light of its Order Denying Class Certification, the Court ordered Defendants to respond in writing why the action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiffs were also given an opportunity to respond within the same time period. Both Defendants and Plaintiffs timely responded on September 22, 2009. The Court fully considered the arguments raised by both parties in favor of the Court's retaining jurisdiction. Upon review of the facts, the Court found dismissal proper based lack of complete diversity. Therefore, on September 30, 2009, the Court dismissed the action in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: October 16, 2009
____________________________ R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?