United States of America v. Assorted Firearms, Motorcycles and Other Personal Property

Filing 458

CONSENT JUDGMENT of Forfeiture as to Claimant Richard Gutierrez only by Judge David O. Carter. (See Judgment for details) (db)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney ROBERT E. DUGDALE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK California Bar No. 149883 Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-6166 Facsimile: (213) 894-7177 E-mail: Steven.Welk@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 WESTERN DIVISION 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ASSORTED FIREARMS, ) MOTORCYCLES AND OTHER ) PERSONAL PROPERTY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) RICARDO GUTIERREZ, ) ) Claimant. ) ____________________________) NO. CV 09-1887 DOC CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE AS TO CLAIMANT RICARDO GUTIERREZ ONLY [NOTE: THIS ORDER RESOLVES THE CLAIMS OF ONE CLAIMANT, BUT IS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF THE CASE] 23 24 Plaintiff and Claimant Ricardo Gutierrez (“Claimant”) have 25 made a stipulated request for the entry of this Consent Judgment, 26 resolving the claim of Claimant in this action in its entirety. 27 Claimant filed a timely claim to the defendant $21,260.00 in U.S. 28 Currency (09-ATF-000090). 1 Claimant did not file claims to any of the other defendant 2 assets, and no other claimants have filed claims to the defendant 3 currency listed above. 4 has expired. 5 the defendant currency. 6 The time for filing claims and answers No other person is believed to have any claim to The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, 7 and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY ORDERS ADJUDGES AND 8 DECREES: 9 1. The government has given and published notice of this 10 action as required by law, including Supplemental Rule G for 11 Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, 12 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of this 13 Court. 14 forfeiture of the defendant currency other than Claimant, and the 15 time for filing claims and answers has expired. 16 jurisdiction over the parties to this judgment and the defendant 17 currency described herein. 18 defendant currency described herein other than Claimant are 19 deemed to have admitted the allegations of the first amended 20 complaint with respect to the defendant currency. 21 2. No claims or answers have been filed to contest the This Court has Any potential claimants to the $10,630.00 of the defendant U.S. Currency (09-ATF- 22 000090), without interest, shall be returned to Claimant through 23 his counsel. 24 defendant $10,630.00 to claimant not later than 30 days after (a) 25 the court enters this Consent Judgment and (b) Claimant provides 26 to the government the bank routing and personal identifiers The United States Marshals Service shall return the 27 28 2 1 needed to effect a wire transfer of the funds, whichever is 2 later. 3. 3 The government shall have judgment against the interests 4 of Claimant (and any potential claimants) as to the remaining 5 $10,630.00 of the defendant U.S. currency (09-ATF-000090), which 6 asset is hereby forfeited and condemned to the United States, and 7 no other right, title or interest shall exist therein. 8 government shall dispose of the forfeited asset according to law. 4. 9 The Claimant has agreed to release the United States of 10 America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including employees 11 and agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & 12 Explosives (“ATF”), from any and all claims, actions or 13 liabilities arising out of or related to the seizure and 14 retention of the defendant currency and/or the commencement of 15 this civil forfeiture action, including, without limitation, any 16 claim for attorneys’ fees, costs or interest which may be 17 asserted on behalf of Claimant against the United States, whether 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise. 5. 19 The court finds that there was reasonable cause for the 20 seizure of the defendant currency and the institution of this 21 action as to the defendant currency. 22 certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 as 23 to the defendant currency. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 3 This judgment constitutes a 1 6. Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs in 2 connection with the seizure, retention and return of the 3 defendant currency. 4 DATED: July 31, 2012 5 ________________________________________ THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 Prepared by: 8 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney ROBERT E. DUGDALE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division 9 10 11 12 /s/ Steven R. Welk STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?