Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
Filing
23
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Petitioner Ernest DeWayne Jones of Petitioner's Phase I and II Budgeting Forms and Declaration of Counsel in Support. (Laurence, Michael)
1 MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854
PATRICIA DANIELS, State Bar No. 162868
2 CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER
3 303 Second Street, Suite 400 South
San Francisco, California 94107
4 Telephone: (415) 348-3800
Facsimile: (415) 348-3873
5 Email: docketing@hcrc.ca.gov
mlaurence@hcrc.ca.gov
6
Attorneys for Ernest Dewayne Jones
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12 Ernest Dewayne Jones,
Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC
13
DEATH PENALTY CASE
14
Petitioner,
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING OF
PETITIONER’S PHASE I AND II
BUDGETING FORMS AND
DECLARATION OF COUNSEL IN
SUPPORT
v.
15 Robert K. Wong Acting Warden of
California State Prison at San Quentin,
16
Respondent
17
18
19
The above-mentioned matter has been designated as an electronically filed case.
20 In accordance with General Order 08-02 and Local Rule 5-4, petitioner’s budgeting
21 materials will be manually filed. Petitioner’s Phase I and II Budgeting Forms and
22 Declaration of Counsel in Support are filed ex parte and under seal pursuant to
23 paragraph 5 of the Court’s April 23, 2009 Order Outlining Procedures for Litigation of
24 a Capital Habeas Case and the Court’s September 23, 2009 Minute Order because they
25 contain information protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work
26 product doctrine
27
28
1
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
JONES V. WONG, CASE NO. CV-09-2158
1
2
Dated: October 9, 2009
Respectfully submitted,
3
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER
4
5
6
By:
7
/s/ Michael Laurence
MICHAEL LAURENCE
Attorneys for Ernest Dewayne Jones
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
JONES V. WONG, CASE NO. CV-09-2158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?