Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong

Filing 23

NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Petitioner Ernest DeWayne Jones of Petitioner's Phase I and II Budgeting Forms and Declaration of Counsel in Support. (Laurence, Michael)

Download PDF
1 MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854 PATRICIA DANIELS, State Bar No. 162868 2 CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648 HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER 3 303 Second Street, Suite 400 South San Francisco, California 94107 4 Telephone: (415) 348-3800 Facsimile: (415) 348-3873 5 Email: docketing@hcrc.ca.gov mlaurence@hcrc.ca.gov 6 Attorneys for Ernest Dewayne Jones 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Ernest Dewayne Jones, Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC 13 DEATH PENALTY CASE 14 Petitioner, NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING OF PETITIONER’S PHASE I AND II BUDGETING FORMS AND DECLARATION OF COUNSEL IN SUPPORT v. 15 Robert K. Wong Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, 16 Respondent 17 18 19 The above-mentioned matter has been designated as an electronically filed case. 20 In accordance with General Order 08-02 and Local Rule 5-4, petitioner’s budgeting 21 materials will be manually filed. Petitioner’s Phase I and II Budgeting Forms and 22 Declaration of Counsel in Support are filed ex parte and under seal pursuant to 23 paragraph 5 of the Court’s April 23, 2009 Order Outlining Procedures for Litigation of 24 a Capital Habeas Case and the Court’s September 23, 2009 Minute Order because they 25 contain information protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work 26 product doctrine 27 28 1 NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING JONES V. WONG, CASE NO. CV-09-2158 1 2 Dated: October 9, 2009 Respectfully submitted, 3 HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER 4 5 6 By: 7 /s/ Michael Laurence MICHAEL LAURENCE Attorneys for Ernest Dewayne Jones 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING JONES V. WONG, CASE NO. CV-09-2158

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?