Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong

Filing 56

Third EXPARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Motion For EvidentiaryHearing filed by Petitioner Ernest DeWayne Jones. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Daniels, Patricia)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854
PATRICIA DANIELS, State Bar No. 162868
CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER
303 Second Street, Suite 400 South
San Francisco, California 94107
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Petitioner ERNEST DEWAYNE JONES

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

11
12

Ernest Dewayne Jones,

Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC

13

Petitioner,

DEATH PENALTY CASE

14
15
16

v.

PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 14DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE HIS MOTION FOR
EVIDENTIARY HEARING;
DECLARATION OF MICHAEL
LAURENCE

Vincent Cullen, Acting Warden of
California State Prison at San Quentin,
Respondent

17
18
19

Pursuant to Rule 7-19 of the Local Rules for the United States District Court for

20

the Central District of California, petitioner Ernest Dewayne Jones hereby applies for

21

an order granting a final 14-day extension of time, to an including February 17, 2011,

22

to file his Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. The Motion for Evidentiary hearing is

23

currently due to be filed February 3, 2011.

24

The basis for this request is set forth in the attached Declaration of Michael

25

Laurence. Petitioner has advised counsel for respondent of this request, and counsel

26

does not oppose this application. The contact information for counsel for respondent is

27

as follows:

28
1
PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 14-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
CV-09-2158-CJC

1
2
3
4

HERBERT S. TETEF
Deputy Attorney General
300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7

Dated: January 28, 2010

Respectfully submitted,
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER

8
9
10
11

/s/ Michael Laurence
By: Michael Laurence
Attorneys for Ernest Dewayne Jones

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 14-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
CV-09-2158-CJC

1

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL LAURENCE IN SUPPORT OF

2

PETITIONER’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 14-DAY EXTENSION OF

3

TIME TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

4

I, Michael Laurence, declare as follows:

5

1.

I am an attorney at law admitted to practice by the State of California and

6

before this Court. I am the Executive Director of the Habeas Corpus Resource Center.

7

I was appointed as lead counsel for petitioner Ernest DeWayne Jones in the above-

8

referenced matter by this Court in an order dated April 14, 2009.

9

2.

On March 10, 2010, petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

10

by a Prisoner in State Custody (28 U.S.C. § 2254). Respondent filed an Answer to

11

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on April 6, 2010.

12

3.

13

April 12, 2010.

14

4.

The parties submitted a joint briefing schedule that this Court adopted on

On July 7, 2010, the parties submitted a joint stipulation regarding

15

discovery and a proposed briefing schedule in which the parties agreed to adhere to the

16

briefing schedule outlined in the April 8, 2010 joint stipulation. This Court adopted

17

the stipulation of the parties by order dated July 12, 2010.

18

5.

In accordance with the joint briefing schedule, petitioner’s Motion for

19

Evidentiary Hearing (Motion) was due on November 5, 2010. Petitioner previously

20

requested, and this Court granted, two extensions of time to file the Motion for

21

Evidentiary Hearing, totaling ninety days. The Motion is currently due on February 3,

22

2011.

23

6.

Since the granting of the extension, counsel for petitioner have diligently

24

researched, investigated, and drafted the Motion. I estimate that ninety percent of the

25

Motion has been drafted. In addition to completing a final draft of the Motion, the

26

entire Motion must be edited to reduce the length of the Motion—by removing less

27

critical and duplicative information—and ensure precision in the presentation.

28

7.

Although at the time I filed the previous extension of time request I
3

PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 14-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
CV-09-2158-CJC

1

expected that this process would be completed by February 3, 2011, unexpected

2

developments have prevented me from doing so. The primary reason for my inability

3

to do so has been my unanticipated absence from the office for nine days this month,

4

for illness and other personal matters. In addition, I have to take approximately two

5

additional days next week to care for a family member undergoing surgery.

6

8.

In addition to preparing the Motion for Evidentiary Hearing in this case,

7

in January, I had conflicting commitments in other capital cases and administrative

8

duties as Executive Director of the Office. On January 5, 2011, I supervised the filing

9

of an extensive Reply to the Informal Response to the Amended Petition for Writ of

10

Habeas in In re Abilez, Case No. S155651, in the California Supreme Court. In

11

addition, I had managerial responsibilities that required my attention, including those

12

related to budgeting in light of the Governor Brown’s announcement of cuts in state

13

spending.

14

9.

On January 28, 2010, Ms. Patricia Daniels, counsel for petitioner, spoke

15

to Herbert Tetef, counsel for respondent, and informed him of the substance of this

16

request for additional time, including the proposed due date. Mr. Tetef authorized

17

petitioner’s counsel to represent to the Court that he has no objection to this request.

18

10.

There have been two prior request for a continuance with respect to the

19

filing of petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. I anticipate that petitioner will

20

not request any further extensions and that the Motion will be filed on or before

21

February 17, 2011.

22
23

The foregoing is true and correct and executed under penalty of perjury under
the laws of the United States on January 28, 2010.

24
25
26

/s/ Michael Laurence____________
Michael Laurence

27
28
4
PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 14-DAY
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
CV-09-2158-CJC