Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
Filing
62
IN CHAMBERS MINUTE ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING by Judge Cormac J. Carney: The Court vacates the current briefing schedule on Petitioners Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. On or before May 18, 2011, Petitioner shall file a Supplemental Brief addressing his entitlement to an evidentiary hearing in view of the Supreme Courts holding in Cullen v. Pinholster, 2011 WL 1225705 (April 4, 2011). (see document for details) (mu)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 09-02158-CJC (Death Penalty)
Title
Jones v. Cullen
Present: The
Honorable
Date
April 6, 2011
Cormac J. Carney
Michelle Urie
N/A
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter / Recorder
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
(N/A)
(N/A)
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
ORDERING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
The Court vacates the current briefing schedule on Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing.
On or before May 18, 2011, Petitioner shall file a Supplemental Brief addressing his entitlement
to an evidentiary hearing in view of the Supreme Court’s holding in Cullen v. Pinholster, 2011 WL
1225705 (April 4, 2011).
Respondent shall file an Opposition limited to the arguments raised in Petitioner’s Supplemental
Brief on or before June 15, 2011.
Petitioner shall file a Reply in support of his Supplemental Brief on or before June 29, 2011.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this
matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
cc: All parties of record
:
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
0
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 09-02158-CJC (Death Penalty)
Title
Date
Jones v. Cullen
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
April 6, 2011
mu
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?