Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong

Filing 66

ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: granting 65 Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to File a Supplemental Brief Addressing his Entitlement to an Evidentiary Hearing. Petitioner is ordered to file a Supplemental Brief Addressing His Entitlement To An Evidentiary Hearing on or before July 18, 2011. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 7 MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854 PATRICIA C. DANIELS, State Bar No. 162868 CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648 HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER 303 Second Street, Suite 400 South San Francisco, California 94107 Telephone: (415) 348-3800 Facsimile: (415) 348-3873 Email: docketing@hcrc.ca.gov mlaurence@hcrc.ca.gov 8 Attorneys for Petitioner Ernest Dewayne Jones 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 12 Ernest Dewayne Jones, Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC 13 Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE 14 15 16 v. Michael Martel, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 30DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ADDRESSING HIS ENTITLEMENT TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING 18 19 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, petitioner’s Ex Parte Application For A 30-Day 20 Extension Of Time To File A Supplemental Brief Addressing His Entitlement To An 21 Evidentiary Hearing is HEREBY GRANTED. 22 Supplemental Brief Addressing His Entitlement To An Evidentiary Hearing on or 23 before July 18, 2011. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED Petitioner is ordered to file a 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 13, 2011 CORMAC J. CARNEY United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ADDRESSING HIS ENTITLEMENT TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING CV-09-2158-CJC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?