Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: granting 65 Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time to File a Supplemental Brief Addressing his Entitlement to an Evidentiary Hearing. Petitioner is ordered to file a Supplemental Brief Addressing His Entitlement To An Evidentiary Hearing on or before July 18, 2011. (twdb)
1
7
MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854
PATRICIA C. DANIELS, State Bar No. 162868
CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER
303 Second Street, Suite 400 South
San Francisco, California 94107
Telephone: (415) 348-3800
Facsimile: (415) 348-3873
Email: docketing@hcrc.ca.gov
mlaurence@hcrc.ca.gov
8
Attorneys for Petitioner Ernest Dewayne Jones
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
12
Ernest Dewayne Jones,
Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC
13
Petitioner,
DEATH PENALTY CASE
14
15
16
v.
Michael Martel, Acting Warden of
California State Prison at San Quentin,
Respondent
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 30DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
ADDRESSING HIS ENTITLEMENT
TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING
18
19
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, petitioner’s Ex Parte Application For A 30-Day
20
Extension Of Time To File A Supplemental Brief Addressing His Entitlement To An
21
Evidentiary Hearing is HEREBY GRANTED.
22
Supplemental Brief Addressing His Entitlement To An Evidentiary Hearing on or
23
before July 18, 2011.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED
Petitioner is ordered to file a
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 13, 2011
CORMAC J. CARNEY
United States District Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ADDRESSING
HIS ENTITLEMENT TO AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING
CV-09-2158-CJC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?