Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
Filing
73
ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: GRANTING 72 Ex Parte Application for a 30-Day Extension of Time to File a Reply to Respondent's Opposition to Petitioner's Supplemental Brief on the Court's Power to Grant an Evidentiary Hearing: Petitioner is ordered to file a Reply on or before October 28,2011. (rla)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854
CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER
303 Second Street, Suite 400 South
San Francisco, California 94107
Telephone: (415) 348-3800
Facsimile: (415) 348-3873
Email: docketing@hcrc.ca.gov
mlaurence@hcrc.ca.gov
Attorneys for Petitioner Ernest Dewayne Jones
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
Ernest Dewayne Jones,
Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC
12
Petitioner,
DEATH PENALTY CASE
13
14
15
v.
Michael Martel, Acting Warden of
California State Prison at San Quentin,
Respondent.
16
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR A 30DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE A REPLY TO RESPONDENT’S
OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF ON THE
COURT’S POWER TO GRANT AN
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
18
19
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Petitioner’s Ex Parte Application For A 30-Day
20
Extension Of Time To File A Reply to Respondent’s Opposition to Petitioner’s
21
Supplemental Brief On The Court’s Power To Grant An Evidentiary Hearing is
22
HEREBY GRANTED. Petitioner is ordered to file a Reply on or before October 28,
23
2011.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: September 27, 2011
CORMAC J. CARNEY
United States District Judge
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PET’R’S EX PARTE
APPL FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY
TO RESP’S OPPOSITION TO PET’R’S SUPPL BRIEF ON
THE COURT’S POWER TO GRANT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING
CV-09-2158-CJC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?