Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong

Filing 77

ORDER RE Schedule for merits briefing by Judge Cormac J. Carney, re joint stipulation 76 . Petitioner shall file his opening brief addressing how each claim satisfies 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) and/or (d)(2) on or before September 10, 2012, Respondent shall file an Opposition 90 days after Petitioners opening brief, and Petitioner shall file a Reply 60 days after Respondents Opposition. (twdb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 9 10 Ernest Dewayne Jones, Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC 11 Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE 12 13 14 15 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SCHEDULE FOR MERITS BRIEFING UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) and 2254(d)(2) Vincent Cullen, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, Respondent. 16 17 The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Joint Stipulation Re: Schedule for Merits 18 Briefing Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) and 2254(d)(2) lodged with the Court on April 19 12, 2012. Petitioner shall file his opening brief addressing how each claim satisfies 28 20 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) and/or (d)(2) on or before September 10, 2012, Respondent 21 shall file an Opposition 90 days after Petitioner’s opening brief, and Petitioner shall 22 file a Reply 60 days after Respondent’s Opposition. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 Dated: 4/16/12 CORMAC J. CARNEY United States District Judge 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR MERITS BRIEFING CV-09-2158-CJC 1 Submitted on April 12, 2012 2 By: 3 HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER 303 Second Street, Suite 400 South San Francisco, California 94107 Telephone: (415) 348-3800 Facsimile: (415) 348-3873 4 5 6 7 8 /s/ MICHAEL LAURENCE Attorney for Petitioner 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR MERITS BRIEFING CV-09-2158-CJC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?