Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
Filing
81
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE OPENING BRIEF AND IMPOSING PAGE LIMIT 78 : Petitioner shall file his Opening Brief on or before December 10, 2012. All other briefing schedules from the Court's April 16, 2012 Order re: Scheduling for Merits Briefing under 2254(d)(1) and 2254(d)(2) shall remainin place.In addition, Petitioner's Opening Brief shall be limited to 100 pages; Respondent's Opposition shall be limited to 100 pages; and Petitioner's Reply shall be limited to 50 pages. (rla)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: CV 09-2158 CJC DEATH PENALTY CASE
Date: September 6, 2012
Title: JONES V.CHAPPELL
==============================================================================
DOCKET ENTRY:
ORDER RE: BRIEFING ON THE APPLICATION OF 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)
==============================================================================
PRESENT:
Honorable Cormac J. Carney, United States District Judge
Michelle Urie
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
None Present
N/A
Court Reporter/Tape No.
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:
None Present
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
AND IMPOSING PAGE LIMIT
The Court is in receipt of Petitioner’s Ex Parte Application for a 180-day Extension of Time to File an
Opening Brief on the Application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d), and Respondent’s Opposition.
Petitioner shall file his Opening Brief on or before December 10, 2012. All other briefing schedules from
the Court’s April 16, 2012 Order re: Scheduling for Merits Briefing under § 2254(d)(1) and 2254(d)(2) shall remain
in place.
In addition, Petitioner’s Opening Brief shall be limited to 100 pages; Respondent’s Opposition shall be
limited to 100 pages; and Petitioner’s Reply shall be limited to 50 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
cc: All Parties of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?