Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong

Filing 87

ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is granted to and including May 10, 2013, in which to file his Opposition to Petitioner's Opening 2254(D) Brief on Evidentiary Hearing Claims. All other briefing schedules from the Court's April 16, 2012 Order re: Schedule For Merits Briefing Under 28 U.S.C. 2254(d)(1) and 2254(d)(2) shall remain in effect. Granting 86 Ex Parte Application for Enlargement of Time to File. (rla)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California DANE R. GILLETTE Chief Assistant Attorney General LANCE E. WINTERS Senior Assistant Attorney General XIOMARA COSTELLO Deputy Attorney General HERBERT S. TETEF Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 185303 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: (213) 897-0201 Fax: (213) 897-6496 E-mail: DocketingLAAWT@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Respondent 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 Petitioner, ORDER 15 18 CAPITAL CASE v. 16 17 Case No. CV-09-2158-CJC ERNEST DEWAYNE JONES, KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin, 19 Respondent. 20 21 Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Respondent is granted to and 22 including May 10, 2013, in which to file his Opposition to Petitioner’s Opening 23 2254(D) Brief on Evidentiary Hearing Claims. All other briefing schedules from 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 the Court’s April 16, 2012 Order re: Schedule For Merits Briefing Under 28 U.S.C. 2 § 2254(d)(1) and 2254(d)(2) shall remain in effect. 3 Presented by: /s/ Herbert S. Tetef Deputy Attorney General 4 5 Dated: March 06, 2013 __________________________ The Honorable Cormac J. Carney U.S. District Judge 6 7 LA2009505879/60955471.doc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?