Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
Filing
97
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Cliona R Plunkett counsel for Petitioner Ernest DeWayne Jones. Bethany Lobo is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Petitioner Ernest Dewayne Jones. (Plunkett, Cliona)
MICHAEL LAURENCE, State Bar No. 121854
CLIONA PLUNKETT, State Bar No. 256648
HABEAS CORPUS RESOURCE CENTER
303 Second Street, Suite 400 South
San Francisco, CA 94107
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Ernest Dewayne Jones
CASE NUMBER
PLAINTIFF(S)
v.
Michael Martel, Acting Warden of California
State Prison at San Quentin
DEFENDANT(S).
The following information must be provided:
I, BETHANY LOBO
, 248109
Name
CV-09-2158-CJC
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF
ATTORNEY INFORMATION
, blobo@hcrc.ca.gov
CA Bar ID Number
E-mail Address
G am counsel of record or G out-of-state attorney in the above-entitled cause of action for the following
party(s)
Ernest DeWayne Jones
and am requesting the following change(s):
THIS SECTION MUST BE COMPLETED IF YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS IS TO BE ADDED.
I G consent G do not consent to receive service of documents by electronic means in
accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E) and 77 (d), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 49(b)-(d).
SELECT THE CATEGORY AND COMPLETE THE INFORMATION REQUESTED:
G TO UPDATE NAME OR FIRM INFORMATION:
G
I am providing the following new information pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.7 to be updated on the
above-entitled cause of action.
PROVIDE ONLY THE INFORMATION THAT HAS CHANGED
Attorney Name changed to
New Firm/Government Agency Name
New Address
New Telephone Number
New E-mail address
New Facsimile Number
G TO BE ADDED AS COUNSEL OF RECORD: CHECK ONE BOX
G
I am counsel of record in the above-entitled action and should have been added to the docket in
G
G-06 (10/10)
this case. I made my first appearance in this case on
This constitutes my Notice of Appearance to appear as counsel of record for the party(s) listed
above in the above-entitled action.
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Page 1 of 2
IF YOUR FI RM I S NOT ALREADY PART OF THI S ACTI ON AND ARE A SSOCIATING IN AS COUNSEL OF RECORD A NOTI CE OF
ASSOCIATION SHOULD BE FI LED. IF YOU ARE GOI NG TO APPEAR PRO HAC VI CE, A SEPARATE APPLI CATION OF NON -RESIDENT
ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE, G-64 MUST BE FILED.
Attorney Name
Firm/Government Agency Name
Address:
Telephone Number
New E-mail address
G
CA State Bar Number
Facsimile Number
TO BE REMOVED FROM THE CASE: **
G
I am G the aforementioned attorney from my firm is no longer counsel of record in the above- entitled
cause of action.
CHECK ONE BOX
G
The order relieving me/the aforementioned attorney from my firm was filed on:
G
There is/are other attorney(s) from the undersigned attorney’s law firm/government agency who
are counsel of record in this case.
G
.
I am G the aforementioned attorney is no longer with the firm/government agency representing
the above-named party in this action. There is/are attorney(s) from my former firm/government
agency who are currently counsel of record in this case.
**This form cannot be used as a substitution of attorney fom. For substitution of attorney procedures
r
please refer to Local Rule 83-2.9 and form G-01,Request for Substitution of Attorney and G-01ORDER,
Order on Request for Substitution of Attorney. At least one member of the firm/government agency
MUST continue to represent and receive service for the parties indicated above in this action.
Date: November 14, 2013
/S/ Bethany Lobo
Signature of Attorney of Record / Attorney for the Firm
PLEASE NOTE: CM/ECF users must update t heir account information in the system
pursuant to the General Order authorizing electronic filing, in addition to filing this Notice
of Change of Attorney Informat ion. A separate Notice must be filed in every pending case
pursuant to Local Rule 83–2.7.
G-06 (10/10)
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?