United States of America v. $83,749.00 In U.S. Currency et al
Filing
51
CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. As between the United States of America, on the one hand, and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other hand, this Court has jurisdiction ov er the subject matter of this action and the parties to this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency. Notice of this action has been given as required by law. No appearances have been made in this case by any person with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency other than by claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega. The Court deems that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture t o be true with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency. The sum of $35,000.00 only (plus any interest earned by the United States of America on that sum), less any debts or other amounts owed by claimant Hector Raya Ortega which the Un ited States of America is entitled to offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716,1shall be returned to claimant Hector Raya Ortega. The remainder of the defendant $83,749.00 currency (i.e., $48,749.00), plus any interest earned by the United States of America on $48,749.00 of the defendant $83,749.00 currency shall be condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds in accordance with law. Related to: Notice of Lodging,, 50 . (See order for details) (shb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
ROBERT E. DUGDALE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
VICTOR A. RODGERS
California Bar No. 101281
Assistant United States Attorney
Asset Forfeiture Section
Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor
312 North Spring Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2569
Facsimile: (213) 894-7177
E-mail: Victor.Rodgers@usdoj.gov
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
WESTERN DIVISION
15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
16
Plaintiff,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
$83,749.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
$73,935.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
$19,475.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
$15,147.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY,
$8,160.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
AND NINE (9) PIECES OF
MISCELLANEOUS JEWELRY,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
SERGIO ORTEGA, SR., SOCORRO
ORTEGA, SERGIO ORTEGA, JR.,
YOLANDA ORTEGA, HECTOR
ORTEGA, RENEE BETH EARLE AND
OCTAVIO RAYA ORTEGA,
Claimants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 09-2612-DSF(VBKx)
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE
BETWEEN PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA AND CLAIMANTS HECTOR
RAYA ORTEGA AND YOLANDA ORTEGA
WITH RESPECT TO THE DEFENDANT
ASSETS CLAIMED BY CLAIMANTS
HECTOR RAYA ORTEGA AND YOLANDA
ORTEGA IN THIS CIVIL FORFEITURE
PROCEEDING
[This Proposed Consent Judgment
Is Not Dispositive Of This
Entire Action]
1
On or about April 30, 2009, plaintiff United States of America
2
(“the United States of America”) filed a First Amended Complaint
3
for Forfeiture alleging that the defendants are subject to
4
forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
5
in the First Amended Complaint are:
6
(1)
The defendants named
$83,749.00 in U.S. Currency (the “defendant $83,749.00
7
currency”) seized on or about November 13, 2007 from an Antioch,
8
California residence;
9
(2)
$73,935.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about November
10
16, 2007 from a vehicle being driven near Main Street and Neroly
11
Road in Oakley, California;
12
13
14
(3)
$19,475.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about December
1, 2008 at Broken Wheel Bar, 5620 Main Street, Oakley, California);
(4)
$15,147.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about April 2,
15
2008 from a vehicle being driven near Highway 24 and Pleasant Hill
16
Road in Lafayette, California;
17
18
19
(5)
$8,160.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about December 1,
2008 from a Brentwood, California residence; and
(6)
Nine (9) pieces of miscellaneous jewelry (the “defendant
20
jewelry”) seized on or about December 1, 2008 from a Brentwood,
21
California residence.
22
Claimant Sergio Ortega, Jr. filed a claim to defendant
23
$73,935.00 in U.S. Currency on or about June 3, 2009; claimants
24
Sergio Ortega, Sr. and Socorro Ortega filed claims to defendant
25
$19,475.00 in U.S. Currency on or about June 3, 2009; claimants
26
Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega filed claims to defendant
27
$83,749.00 currency on or about June 11, 2009; claimant Renee Beth
28
Earle filed a claim to $3,760.00 out of the defendant $8,160.00 in
2
1
U.S. Currency and the defendant jewelry on or about June 24, 2009;
2
and claimant Octavio Raya Ortega filed a claim to defendant
3
$15,147.00 in U.S. Currency, $4,400.00 out of the defendant
4
$8,160.00 in U.S. Currency and the defendant jewelry on or about
5
July 6, 2009.
6
Claimants Sergio Ortega, Jr., Sergio Ortega, Sr. and Socorro
7
Ortega answered the First Amended Complaint on or about June 11,
8
2009; and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega answered
9
the First Amended Complaint on or about July 27, 2009.
10
No other parties have appeared in this case and the time for
11
filing claims and answers has expired.
12
Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, no other parties have filed a claim
13
to the defendant $83,749.00 currency.
14
Other than claimants Hector
The United States of America, on the one hand, and claimants
15
Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other hand, have now
16
agreed to settle this action relative to the disputes between them
17
with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency, and to avoid
18
further litigation by entering into this Consent Judgment of
19
Forfeiture.
20
The Court having been duly advised of and having considered
21
the matter, and based upon the mutual consent of the parties
22
hereto,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
24
1.
As between the United States of America, on the one hand,
25
and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other
26
hand, this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this
27
action and the parties to this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture with
28
respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency.
3
1
2.
As between the United States of America, on the one hand,
2
and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other
3
hand, the First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture states a claim for
4
relief pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) with respect to the
5
defendant $83,749.00 currency.
6
3.
Notice of this action has been given as required by law.
7
No appearances have been made in this case by any person with
8
respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency other than by
9
claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega.
The Court deems
10
that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the
11
First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture to be true with respect to
12
the defendant $83,749.00 currency.
13
4.
The sum of $35,000.00 only (plus any interest earned by
14
the United States of America on that sum), less any debts or other
15
amounts owed by claimant Hector Raya Ortega which the United States
16
of America is entitled to offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716,1
17
shall be returned to claimant Hector Raya Ortega.
18
the defendant $83,749.00 currency (i.e., $48,749.00), plus any
19
interest earned by the United States of America on $48,749.00 of
20
the defendant $83,749.00 currency shall be condemned and forfeited
21
to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds
22
in accordance with law.
23
5.
The remainder of
The funds to be returned to claimant Hector Raya Ortega
24
pursuant to paragraph 4 above shall be paid to claimant Hector Raya
25
Ortega by electronic transfer directly into the client trust
26
27
28
1
31 U.S.C. § 3716, the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996
requires the United States of America to offset from its payments
delinquent non-tax debts owed to the United States of America and
delinquent debts owed to States, including past-due child support
enforced by States.
4
1
account of the Law Offices of Doron Weinberg, which is the
2
successor to Weinberg & Wilder (i.e., the law firm that is attorney
3
of record for claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega in
4
this case).
5
claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega in this case.
6
Claimant Hector Raya Ortega (through his attorney of record Nina
7
Wilder, Esq.) shall provide all information and complete all
8
documents requested by the United States of America in order for
9
the United States of America to complete the transfer and determine
Nina Wilder Esq., is the attorney of record for
10
the government’s right to any offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716
11
including, without limitation, providing claimant Hector Raya
12
Ortega’s social security and taxpayer identification numbers, and
13
the identity of the bank, the bank’s address and the account name,
14
account number, account type and wire transfer routing number for
15
the client trust account to which the transfer of funds is to be
16
made.
6.
17
Claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, and each
18
of them, hereby release the United States of America, its agencies,
19
agents, officers, employees and representatives, including, without
20
limitation, all agents, officers, employees and representatives of
21
the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Department of Justice
22
and their respective agencies, as well as all agents, officers,
23
employees and representatives of any state or local governmental or
24
law enforcement agency involved in the investigation or prosecution
25
of this matter, from any and all claims, actions, or liabilities
26
arising out of or related to this action, including, without
27
limitation, any claim for attorney fees, costs, and interest, which
28
/ / /
5
1
may be asserted by or on behalf of claimants Hector Raya Ortega and
2
Yolanda Ortega, or either of them.
3
7.
As between the United States of America, on the one hand,
4
and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other
5
hand, the Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the
6
seizure of the defendant $83,749.00 currency and institution of
7
these proceedings against the defendant $83,749.00 currency.
8
judgment shall be construed as a certificate of reasonable cause
9
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 as between the United States of
This
10
America, on the one hand, and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and
11
Yolanda Ortega, on the other hand, with respect to the defendant
12
$83,749.00 currency.
13
8.
The Court further finds that claimants Hector Raya Ortega
14
and Yolanda Ortega did not substantially prevail in this action,
15
and each of the parties hereto shall bear their own attorney fees
16
and costs.
17
18
DATED: February 22, 2012
__________________________________
THE HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
CONSENT
1
2
The parties hereto consent to the above Consent Judgment of
3
Forfeiture and waive any right of appeal of this Consent Judgment
4
of Forfeiture.
5
DATED: February 16, 2012
ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
United States Attorney
ROBERT E. DUGDALE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Criminal Division
STEVEN R. WELK
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section
6
7
8
9
10
/s/ Victor A. Rodgers
VICTOR A. RODGERS
Assistant United States Attorney
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
13
14
DATED: February 5, 2012
NINA WILDER
15
16
/s/ Nina Wilder
NINA WILDER
17
Attorneys for Claimants
HECTOR RAYA ORTEGA and
YOLANDA ORTEGA
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?