United States of America v. $83,749.00 In U.S. Currency et al

Filing 51

CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. As between the United States of America, on the one hand, and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other hand, this Court has jurisdiction ov er the subject matter of this action and the parties to this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency. Notice of this action has been given as required by law. No appearances have been made in this case by any person with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency other than by claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega. The Court deems that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture t o be true with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency. The sum of $35,000.00 only (plus any interest earned by the United States of America on that sum), less any debts or other amounts owed by claimant Hector Raya Ortega which the Un ited States of America is entitled to offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716,1shall be returned to claimant Hector Raya Ortega. The remainder of the defendant $83,749.00 currency (i.e., $48,749.00), plus any interest earned by the United States of America on $48,749.00 of the defendant $83,749.00 currency shall be condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds in accordance with law. Related to: Notice of Lodging,, 50 . (See order for details) (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney ROBERT E. DUGDALE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section VICTOR A. RODGERS California Bar No. 101281 Assistant United States Attorney Asset Forfeiture Section Federal Courthouse, 14th Floor 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2569 Facsimile: (213) 894-7177 E-mail: Victor.Rodgers@usdoj.gov 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISION 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 19 20 21 $83,749.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, $73,935.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, $19,475.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, $15,147.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, $8,160.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY AND NINE (9) PIECES OF MISCELLANEOUS JEWELRY, 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERGIO ORTEGA, SR., SOCORRO ORTEGA, SERGIO ORTEGA, JR., YOLANDA ORTEGA, HECTOR ORTEGA, RENEE BETH EARLE AND OCTAVIO RAYA ORTEGA, Claimants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 09-2612-DSF(VBKx) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE BETWEEN PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND CLAIMANTS HECTOR RAYA ORTEGA AND YOLANDA ORTEGA WITH RESPECT TO THE DEFENDANT ASSETS CLAIMED BY CLAIMANTS HECTOR RAYA ORTEGA AND YOLANDA ORTEGA IN THIS CIVIL FORFEITURE PROCEEDING [This Proposed Consent Judgment Is Not Dispositive Of This Entire Action] 1 On or about April 30, 2009, plaintiff United States of America 2 (“the United States of America”) filed a First Amended Complaint 3 for Forfeiture alleging that the defendants are subject to 4 forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). 5 in the First Amended Complaint are: 6 (1) The defendants named $83,749.00 in U.S. Currency (the “defendant $83,749.00 7 currency”) seized on or about November 13, 2007 from an Antioch, 8 California residence; 9 (2) $73,935.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about November 10 16, 2007 from a vehicle being driven near Main Street and Neroly 11 Road in Oakley, California; 12 13 14 (3) $19,475.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about December 1, 2008 at Broken Wheel Bar, 5620 Main Street, Oakley, California); (4) $15,147.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about April 2, 15 2008 from a vehicle being driven near Highway 24 and Pleasant Hill 16 Road in Lafayette, California; 17 18 19 (5) $8,160.00 in U.S. Currency seized on or about December 1, 2008 from a Brentwood, California residence; and (6) Nine (9) pieces of miscellaneous jewelry (the “defendant 20 jewelry”) seized on or about December 1, 2008 from a Brentwood, 21 California residence. 22 Claimant Sergio Ortega, Jr. filed a claim to defendant 23 $73,935.00 in U.S. Currency on or about June 3, 2009; claimants 24 Sergio Ortega, Sr. and Socorro Ortega filed claims to defendant 25 $19,475.00 in U.S. Currency on or about June 3, 2009; claimants 26 Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega filed claims to defendant 27 $83,749.00 currency on or about June 11, 2009; claimant Renee Beth 28 Earle filed a claim to $3,760.00 out of the defendant $8,160.00 in 2 1 U.S. Currency and the defendant jewelry on or about June 24, 2009; 2 and claimant Octavio Raya Ortega filed a claim to defendant 3 $15,147.00 in U.S. Currency, $4,400.00 out of the defendant 4 $8,160.00 in U.S. Currency and the defendant jewelry on or about 5 July 6, 2009. 6 Claimants Sergio Ortega, Jr., Sergio Ortega, Sr. and Socorro 7 Ortega answered the First Amended Complaint on or about June 11, 8 2009; and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega answered 9 the First Amended Complaint on or about July 27, 2009. 10 No other parties have appeared in this case and the time for 11 filing claims and answers has expired. 12 Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, no other parties have filed a claim 13 to the defendant $83,749.00 currency. 14 Other than claimants Hector The United States of America, on the one hand, and claimants 15 Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other hand, have now 16 agreed to settle this action relative to the disputes between them 17 with respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency, and to avoid 18 further litigation by entering into this Consent Judgment of 19 Forfeiture. 20 The Court having been duly advised of and having considered 21 the matter, and based upon the mutual consent of the parties 22 hereto, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 24 1. As between the United States of America, on the one hand, 25 and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other 26 hand, this Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this 27 action and the parties to this Consent Judgment of Forfeiture with 28 respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency. 3 1 2. As between the United States of America, on the one hand, 2 and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other 3 hand, the First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture states a claim for 4 relief pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) with respect to the 5 defendant $83,749.00 currency. 6 3. Notice of this action has been given as required by law. 7 No appearances have been made in this case by any person with 8 respect to the defendant $83,749.00 currency other than by 9 claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega. The Court deems 10 that all other potential claimants admit the allegations of the 11 First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture to be true with respect to 12 the defendant $83,749.00 currency. 13 4. The sum of $35,000.00 only (plus any interest earned by 14 the United States of America on that sum), less any debts or other 15 amounts owed by claimant Hector Raya Ortega which the United States 16 of America is entitled to offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716,1 17 shall be returned to claimant Hector Raya Ortega. 18 the defendant $83,749.00 currency (i.e., $48,749.00), plus any 19 interest earned by the United States of America on $48,749.00 of 20 the defendant $83,749.00 currency shall be condemned and forfeited 21 to the United States of America, which shall dispose of those funds 22 in accordance with law. 23 5. The remainder of The funds to be returned to claimant Hector Raya Ortega 24 pursuant to paragraph 4 above shall be paid to claimant Hector Raya 25 Ortega by electronic transfer directly into the client trust 26 27 28 1 31 U.S.C. § 3716, the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 requires the United States of America to offset from its payments delinquent non-tax debts owed to the United States of America and delinquent debts owed to States, including past-due child support enforced by States. 4 1 account of the Law Offices of Doron Weinberg, which is the 2 successor to Weinberg & Wilder (i.e., the law firm that is attorney 3 of record for claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega in 4 this case). 5 claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega in this case. 6 Claimant Hector Raya Ortega (through his attorney of record Nina 7 Wilder, Esq.) shall provide all information and complete all 8 documents requested by the United States of America in order for 9 the United States of America to complete the transfer and determine Nina Wilder Esq., is the attorney of record for 10 the government’s right to any offset pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3716 11 including, without limitation, providing claimant Hector Raya 12 Ortega’s social security and taxpayer identification numbers, and 13 the identity of the bank, the bank’s address and the account name, 14 account number, account type and wire transfer routing number for 15 the client trust account to which the transfer of funds is to be 16 made. 6. 17 Claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, and each 18 of them, hereby release the United States of America, its agencies, 19 agents, officers, employees and representatives, including, without 20 limitation, all agents, officers, employees and representatives of 21 the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Department of Justice 22 and their respective agencies, as well as all agents, officers, 23 employees and representatives of any state or local governmental or 24 law enforcement agency involved in the investigation or prosecution 25 of this matter, from any and all claims, actions, or liabilities 26 arising out of or related to this action, including, without 27 limitation, any claim for attorney fees, costs, and interest, which 28 / / / 5 1 may be asserted by or on behalf of claimants Hector Raya Ortega and 2 Yolanda Ortega, or either of them. 3 7. As between the United States of America, on the one hand, 4 and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and Yolanda Ortega, on the other 5 hand, the Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the 6 seizure of the defendant $83,749.00 currency and institution of 7 these proceedings against the defendant $83,749.00 currency. 8 judgment shall be construed as a certificate of reasonable cause 9 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 as between the United States of This 10 America, on the one hand, and claimants Hector Raya Ortega and 11 Yolanda Ortega, on the other hand, with respect to the defendant 12 $83,749.00 currency. 13 8. The Court further finds that claimants Hector Raya Ortega 14 and Yolanda Ortega did not substantially prevail in this action, 15 and each of the parties hereto shall bear their own attorney fees 16 and costs. 17 18 DATED: February 22, 2012 __________________________________ THE HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 CONSENT 1 2 The parties hereto consent to the above Consent Judgment of 3 Forfeiture and waive any right of appeal of this Consent Judgment 4 of Forfeiture. 5 DATED: February 16, 2012 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. United States Attorney ROBERT E. DUGDALE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division STEVEN R. WELK Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Asset Forfeiture Section 6 7 8 9 10 /s/ Victor A. Rodgers VICTOR A. RODGERS Assistant United States Attorney 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 13 14 DATED: February 5, 2012 NINA WILDER 15 16 /s/ Nina Wilder NINA WILDER 17 Attorneys for Claimants HECTOR RAYA ORTEGA and YOLANDA ORTEGA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?