In re C. R. Legal, Sr.
Filing
32
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 10/13/2011, recognizing the pro se status of appellant C.R. Legal, Sr., this Court granted appellant's request for a 4 5-day extension of time within which to file his opening brief, requiring appellant to file his opening brief by no later than 11/28/2011 31 . Appellant, having failed to file his opening brief, is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by 12/20/2011, why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant is advised that failure to file a timely response to this order shall result in the dismissal of this appeal. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No.
Date
CV 09-2715-DMG
December 6, 2011
Title In re C.R. Legal, Sr., Debtor (BK 09-11150; ADV No. 09-01121)
C.R. Legal, Sr., Appellant v. H.P. Capital Investments, Inc., Appellee
Present: The Honorable
Page
1 of 1
DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
VALENCIA VALLERY
Deputy Clerk
NOT REPORTED
Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s)
None Present
Attorneys Present for Defendant(s)
None Present
Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
On October 13, 2011, recognizing the pro se status of appellant C.R. Legal, Sr., this
Court granted appellant’s request for a 45-day extension of time within which to file his opening
brief, requiring appellant to file his opening brief by no later than November 28, 2011.
Appellant, having failed to file his opening brief, is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in
writing by December 20, 2011, why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Appellant is advised that failure to file a timely response to this order shall result in the dismissal
of this appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk VV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?