In re C. R. Legal, Sr.

Filing 32

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 10/13/2011, recognizing the pro se status of appellant C.R. Legal, Sr., this Court granted appellant's request for a 4 5-day extension of time within which to file his opening brief, requiring appellant to file his opening brief by no later than 11/28/2011 31 . Appellant, having failed to file his opening brief, is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by 12/20/2011, why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant is advised that failure to file a timely response to this order shall result in the dismissal of this appeal. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Case No. Date CV 09-2715-DMG December 6, 2011 Title In re C.R. Legal, Sr., Debtor (BK 09-11150; ADV No. 09-01121) C.R. Legal, Sr., Appellant v. H.P. Capital Investments, Inc., Appellee Present: The Honorable Page 1 of 1 DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE VALENCIA VALLERY Deputy Clerk NOT REPORTED Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) None Present Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On October 13, 2011, recognizing the pro se status of appellant C.R. Legal, Sr., this Court granted appellant’s request for a 45-day extension of time within which to file his opening brief, requiring appellant to file his opening brief by no later than November 28, 2011. Appellant, having failed to file his opening brief, is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by December 20, 2011, why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Appellant is advised that failure to file a timely response to this order shall result in the dismissal of this appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk VV

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?