Water, Inc. v. Everpure, Inc. et al

Filing 256

JUDGMENT AS TO PURCELL MURRAY COMPANY, INC. by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Having considered the Motions for Summary Judgment and Judgment on the Pleadings (the "Motions") filed by Purcell Murray Company, Inc. ("Purcell Murray") and having considered the Parties' briefing, evidentiary objections, and other submissions relating to those Motions, as well as oral argument presented by counsel at the December 19, 2011 hearing on the Motions, the Court has reached the following decision, the grounds for which are fully set forth in the December 20, 2011 Order Granting Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and Judgment on the Pleadings, IT IS ORDERED that summary judgment is granted in Purcell Murrays' favor, th at Plaintiff Water, Inc. recover nothing, that all of its claims against said Defendant be dismissed on the merits, and that said Defendant recover its costs. There being no further claims pending between plaintiff Water, Inc. and defendant Purcell Murray and there being no just reason for delay of entry of Judgment as between these parties, the Clerk is hereby directed to enter Judgment in favor of defendant Purcell Murray and against plaintiff Water, Inc. (bm)

1
2
3
4
5
6

THOMAS J. LoSAVIO, SBN 051023
KURT BRIDGMAN, SBN 145151
JAMES F. REGAN, SBN 252199
LOW, BALL & LYNCH
505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
PURCELL MURRAY COMPANY, INC.

7
8
9

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - LOS ANGELES

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

WATER, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
EVERPURE, INC.; EVERPURE, LLC;
)
PENTAIR RESIDENTIAL FILTRATION, )
LLC; PENTAIR, INC.; PURCELL
)
MURRAY COMPANY, INC; GERARD
)
McKEOWN; MIKE MADSEN; DEBRA
)
BARTON; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendant(s)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
____________________________________ )

CASE NO.: CV 09-03389 ABC (SSx)
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AS TO
PURCELL MURRAY COMPANY,
INC.
Judge: Hon. Audrey B. Collins
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Suzanne Segal
Date Complaint Filed: May 13, 2009
Discovery Cutoff
Date: November 1, 2011
Pretrial Conference: January 9, 2012
Trial Date: vacated

23

Having considered the Motions for Summary Judgment and Judgment on the

24

Pleadings (the "Motions") filed by Purcell Murray Company, Inc. ("Purcell Murray") and

25

having considered the Parties' briefing, evidentiary objections, and other submissions

26

relating to those Motions, as well as oral argument presented by counsel at the December

27

19, 2011 hearing on the Motions, the Court has reached the following decision, the

28

grounds for which are fully set forth in the December 20, 2011 Order Granting
-1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AS TO PURCELL MURRAY COMPANY, INC.
C:\Temp\notesC7A056\Judgment.wpd

CASE NO.: CV 09-03389 ABC (SSx)

1
2

Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and Judgment on the Pleadings,
IT IS ORDERED that summary judgment is granted in Purcell Murray’s' favor,

3

that Plaintiff Water, Inc. recover nothing, that all of its claims against said Defendant be

4

dismissed on the merits, and that said Defendant recover its costs.

5

There being no further claims pending between plaintiff Water, Inc. and defendant

6

Purcell Murray and there being no just reason for delay of entry of Judgment as between

7

these parties, the Clerk is hereby directed to enter Judgment in favor of defendant Purcell

8

Murray and against plaintiff Water, Inc.

9
10

Dated: 2/21/2012

11

__________________________________
Audrey B. Collins
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT AS TO PURCELL MURRAY COMPANY, INC.
C:\Temp\notesC7A056\Judgment.wpd

CASE NO.: CV 09-03389 ABC (SSx)