Environmental World Watch, Inc. et al v. The Walt Disney Company et al

Filing 57

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Having considered the Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement 55 filed by the parties, and having found that good cause exists for the issuance of this Protective Order, it is hereby entered. (ch)

Download PDF
1 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Gene A. Lucero (Bar No. 060252) 2 Gene.Lucero@lw.com Kirk A. Wilkinson (Bar No. 128367) 3 Kirk.Wilkinson@lw.com 355 South Grand Avenue 4 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 485-1234 5 Facsimile: (213) 891-8763 6 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Charity M. Gilbreth (Bar No. 223504) 7 Charity.Gilbreth@lw.com 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 2000 8 Costa Mesa, California 92626-1925 Telephone: (714) 540-1235 9 Facsimile: (714) 755-8290 10 Attorneys for Defendants THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, DISNEY 11 ENTERPRISES, INC., and DISNEY WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC. 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO. CV09-4045 DMG (PLAx) ORDER Assigned To: Hon. Dolly M. Gee Complaint Filed: June 5, 2009 Second Amended Complaint Filed: August 14, 2009 Trial Date: September 6, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL WORLD 16 WATCH, INC., DENNIS JACKSON, ROBERT HILL, ROBIN McCALL, 17 AND WILLIAM McCALL, 18 19 v. Plaintiffs, 20 THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, WALT DISNEY ENTERPRISES, 21 INC., DISNEY WORLDWIDE SERVICES, INC., and DOES 1 22 through 30, Inclusive, 23 24 25 26 27 28 OC\1070021.1 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW O R A N G E CO U N T Y Defendants. 1 Having considered the Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement filed by 2 the parties, and having found that good cause exists for the issuance of this 3 Protective Order, it is hereby entered. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: June 29, 2010 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OC\1070021.1 ATTO R N E Y S AT LAW O R A N G E CO U N T Y By: _______________________________ Honorable Paul L. Abrams United States Magistrate Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?